The topic of this paper has strong application value, and the literature is collected in detail, and the learned knowledge is comprehensively used to solve the problem. The secretary obtained is reasonable, the conclusion is correct and there are innovative opinions. In addition, the format of the paper is correct, the text is standardized, the organization is clear and the language is fluent.
The literature research in this paper is comprehensive and systematic, the guiding ideology of topic selection is clear, the experimental design is reasonable and feasible, and it can be carried out according to the experimental plan and achieve the expected results.
Good (80-89 points) refer to the examples of paper comments.
The topic of the paper is appropriate, with certain independent opinions, sufficient argumentation and extensive information, but the theory and examples are not supported enough. English language expression is basically fluent, with only a few grammatical errors, and the paper format meets the requirements of the specification.
This paper has a novel topic and a unique perspective, which embodies the solid foundation of human resource management theory. In particular, the article can demonstrate and analyze the topic in combination with relevant cases, which has certain practical value. Through the review of the paper, we can see that the author spent a lot of time in collecting data and cases, and also put forward some profound views, but there are still shortcomings in the depth of theory and the citation of some arguments. Generally speaking, this is a qualified paper.
Reference examples of Chinese (70-79 marks) paper reviews.
The topic of the paper is appropriate and the viewpoint is correct, but it lacks original opinions and sufficient argumentation content, but it lacks argumentation depth. English is fluent, but there are some grammatical mistakes. The paper format meets the specification requirements.
Through the paper reference examples (60-69 points)
The title of the paper lacks originality, insufficient argumentation, few concrete examples, too many cliches and too many quotations from others' views. English basically expresses the meaning, but there are many grammatical mistakes. The format of the paper basically meets the requirements.
Reference examples of failed papers (below 60 points)
Improper topic selection; Incorrect views; There are too many grammatical errors; Plagiarism is serious; The format of the paper does not meet the requirements of the specification; Did not finish the paper according to the time requirement.