Read the original text of Chapter 19 of Laozi's Tao Te Ching: Abandoning wisdom will benefit the people a hundred times; Desperate, the people are filial; Never give up profits, thieves have nothing. These three ideas are not enough. Therefore, the order belongs to you: simple, think less, and study without worry. Destroying the saints and giving up wisdom is of great benefit to the people. In Lao Tzu's view, this is because the countermeasures put forward by saints are all for the rule of the monarch; When saints destroy righteousness, the people will naturally restore righteousness, because the more they manage, the less they dare to bully. No clever production, no yearning, no stealing. These three aspects are not enough, but also the following conditions are needed: let the people be exposed to primitive reality, let them stick to a simple psychology, weaken their greed, prohibit them from reading, and avoid their anxiety caused by their unsatisfied desires. Understanding: Lao Tzu understands the truth of governing the country purely from the standpoint of the ruler. Today, this view always feels childish and ridiculous. So, what is wrong with this view? The key is to regard the monarch and the people as a group of irreconcilable opposites and exclusions, which is a replica of monism philosophy. As mentioned above, a country is an inseparable whole, and we should consider not only the management of the country, but also the progress of society and the improvement of people's lives, so as to follow the inevitable law of social development. Therefore, from the perspective of social development, development is the first, management serves development, and management is based on development. Talking about politics without social development can only turn the country into a stagnant pool. If we analyze the rationality of development, management is unique. Without scientific management, there is no development. They are mutual premises under the overall guidance. But this kind of scientific management is by no means to replace the laws of nature with politics. When we talk about a point in philosophy, we must first conform to the essential attributes of things. If you violate this attribute, the effect will be counterproductive. From a politician's point of view, he always puts management first. How to properly curb the phenomenon of management first needs mutual restraint. The lack of a mutually restrictive social system is either chaotic or not conducive to development. Laozi didn't stand in the opposite angle to understand, and didn't grasp the essential attribute of society, which naturally produced absurd views. Therefore, when we think of studying the law of historical development, we also make the mistake that either heroes create history or only admit that the masses are the fundamental driving force for history, and they are right or wrong. The key to learning history is to grasp the essence of progressiveness. This progress is manifested in the continuous improvement of the system, the continuous development of scientific and cultural undertakings and the continuous improvement of living standards. And all this depends on talented people in all fields. Some of us, deeply influenced by the thoughts of some western philosophers, lack basic independent thinking, so that we wander in front of these extremely simple sociological theories and even blush. If you can't win, you have to say that the hero is also a member of the masses. At present, the number of institutions that study some philosophers and celebrities is amazing. If they lack the basic ability of independent thinking and originality, even if they study these people for hundreds of years, they will not make much progress. On the contrary, it will waste people's money (I don't think it is of much value to concentrate on studying a famous book). In some fields, some methods and aspects of understanding problems are still far behind the ancient sages of China, which really deserves our reflection today. Of course, I don't care about the past and the present. China's progress is obvious to all. But we can't hide our shortcomings just because of progress. The paper is very long, so I suggest you view it through the following link:/gudai/080612/08280589-2.html.

Hope to adopt