The beginning of the article is reluctant, and it is boring to write, especially argumentative essays. The article begins without thinking, which will have a negative impact on the object of discussion and the method of argument. If the goal direction is not clear, the discussion will be irrelevant, and the randomness at the beginning of the article will also cause the lack of confidence in writing.
This kind of "random start" situation often appears in time-limited propositional compositions. The teacher asked to hand in the paper in class, "if you can't write it, you have to write it" and "if you don't like it, you have to write it". As a result, some students save time to think, "sit on the boat first", and then find the goal in swimming. This "swimming" often leads to nothing to say. For example, when writing "Talking about Habits", he wrote: "What is a habit ... There are two kinds of habits: good habits and bad habits ... Of course, there are also good habits ..." At first glance, the instrument of "answering words" is very smooth, but these words are dispensable. Writing a six-character article without an opinion halfway is a common problem of the article.
There are some ways to solve the problem of "finding a goal while traveling", such as learning to analyze materials, improving dialectical thinking ability, expanding associative thinking, etc., that is to say, practicing basic skills. But is there a more direct training method? Yes The most obvious problem of "let's go aboard first" is that the beginning is wordy. Here is a starting method, that is, "one-sentence starting method". Whether it is a material composition or a proposition composition, you force yourself to start with only one sentence. Doing so is of great benefit to correcting the insincerity at the beginning of the article. Because you can only use one sentence, you must consider clearly expressing your point of view, forcing yourself to choose the most weighty words from the thinking of the topic as the beginning, and urging yourself to compare and screen the content of thinking. This kind of opening is both concise and clear. The beginning of a sentence is conducive to entering the discussion as soon as possible and making the central part stand out.
Refine your language
The same proposition, relatively close views, the argumentation structure of similar documents, why the article is still divided into high and low levels, this is mainly a problem between languages. It is almost a cancer for middle school students not to pay attention to improving their language level in argumentative writing.
It is a good principle that the language of argumentative writing should first be plain and clear. A point of view, a truth, I hope everyone can accept it. "Say Hao" is the most important lw, but if this view is not profound, simple or even widely known, then "plain" may become "ignorance". It is good to publicize a simple truth in simple language, but it will be more convincing and infectious to publicize a simple truth in wonderful language.
Some students' argumentative essays are clear in thinking and rigorous in structure, but they are used to using extremely naive language to discuss them.
In argumentative writing, we should have the consciousness of refining language, and we should not just be satisfied with "making it clear". "Clarity" is the basic requirement, while "speaking well" and "speaking thoroughly" are the high standard requirements. Can an ordinary sentence be put out in a fascinating way, vividly described in a traditional way, expressed in a novel and vivid way, mobilized to deepen the impression of readers, used to spread stories and render, and enhanced by parallelism?
As long as you can always have this sense of forging language, it is not difficult to improve your language level. Writing an article is just like cooking, with the same materials. How can you be "ambiguous"? You can't do it without asking yourself some questions. This truth is not profound. Many of our classmates' "ignorance" is very good, but it is often only used to taste other people's craftsmanship. Only when we start ourselves, we are hasty. Forging language was not built in a day, but you will never make progress without action.