Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Discussion on Performance Appraisal of Scientific Research Personnel (2)
Discussion on Performance Appraisal of Scientific Research Personnel (2)
Discussion on performance appraisal of scientific research personnel

1) Quantitative setting of performance appraisal indicators.

In order to realize the fair performance evaluation of scientific researchers, the content and evaluation coefficient of performance evaluation of scientific researchers are uniformly set. In the evaluation content, scientific research projects and temporary tasks are divided into grades, categories, project types, participating roles, etc. , achievements, patents, standards, award-winning papers, works, etc. Divided into levels, categories, participating roles, etc. , and set the ability index level of working ability and the' execution level' of working attitude; In the evaluation coefficient, the evaluation coefficient is set for the quarterly evaluation of scientific research projects and temporary tasks, and the evaluation coefficient is set for the evaluation index of project team members evaluated by the project leader. All assessment contents and assessment evaluation coefficients are set in the assessment management system in the form of basic system parameters, which can be changed and set with the change of assessment requirements to meet the new assessment requirements.

2) Performance appraisal methods for scientific researchers.

There are two ways to evaluate the performance of researchers. One is to evaluate the performance of researchers by evaluating the work they are participating in and engaged in. This is mainly for scientific research projects and temporary tasks that researchers participate in. The evaluation of scientific research projects in which researchers participate is based on process evaluation. Because the implementation time span of scientific research projects is generally long, there are several stages of assessment in the implementation process of scientific research projects, and the process assessment of scientific researchers participating in the projects also needs corresponding stages of assessment. In the process evaluation of scientific research projects, researchers need not only the evaluation of scientific research projects by the project evaluation team, but also the evaluation of researchers by the project leader. Then all kinds of evaluations are converted into corresponding evaluation coefficients in the performance evaluation management system of scientific researchers, and then the performance evaluation of scientific researchers participating in scientific research projects is calculated through the calculation formula set in the system. By weighting the evaluation scores of each stage, the system can obtain the performance evaluation of the scientific researchers participating in the project. The assessment of scientific researchers participating in temporary tasks is similar to that of scientific research projects, except that the temporary execution time span is generally short, and the performance assessment of scientific researchers participating in temporary tasks can only be realized as a process assessment of scientific research projects. The second is to collect the work results and usual performance of scientific researchers, and input them into the evaluation system to realize the performance evaluation of scientific researchers. This part of the collection mainly includes achievements, patents and award-winning papers obtained by researchers. The daily performance of work ability and work attitude is evaluated quarterly. By converting the collected data into the corresponding evaluation coefficient in the performance evaluation management system of scientific researchers, the performance evaluation of scientific researchers participating in this part can be calculated through the calculation formula set in the evaluation system.

3.3 The application effect of scientific research personnel performance appraisal management system.

Through the information management system, the overall work and performance files of scientific research personnel are established, and the annual work of scientific research personnel is reflected and recorded systematically, objectively and fairly, as well as the cultivation ability is brought into play and improved, which is convenient for leaders to grasp the situation of everyone and the overall situation of the unit. It overcomes the scattered records of researchers' work in the past. Through the information management system, you can query the annual work tasks, ability improvement, work results and work quality evaluation of each technician. It has further promoted grass-roots management, urged and standardized the planning, staffing, inspection and assessment of work tasks, and reduced the blindness of management.

Through the information management system, researchers can find the gaps in their work in a short time, take effective measures to improve the quality of work, participate in training and learn relevant knowledge in a targeted manner, improve their work skills and avoid simple assessment. It was difficult to see the shortcomings in the assessment before, especially during the work period. Now through the information management system, every technician can check his work and assessment at any time through the online system, so as to constantly correct and improve.

4 conclusion.

To sum up, the performance appraisal system of scientific researchers has improved the performance appraisal management of enterprise departments to a certain extent, further standardized the working standards and assessment methods of departments, and achieved the management objectives of enterprise departments. However, there is still room for improvement in actual operation, and the reasonable setting of performance evaluation indicators and the optimization of evaluation methods need to be continuously improved in future practice. Therefore, it is very important to constantly find new performance appraisal methods to optimize the performance appraisal of enterprise departments.

Paying attention to the recognition and cohesion of researchers, improving their comprehensive quality and stimulating their enthusiasm for innovation are not only related to the smooth development and innovation of scientific research in enterprises, but also the cornerstone of their sustainable development. It can enable enterprises to maintain a certain competitive strength in scientific research level and promote the healthy implementation of the company's overall strategy.

Please continue reading related recommendation: graduation thesis.