Two little frogs sneaked into the farmer's house to play. When they were standing beside a jar and dancing, they accidentally fell into the jar. It was full of sticky oil and they wanted to jump out. The oil is too sticky. Trying to climb out, the wall is too slippery. I tried several times, but nothing came of it. The frog thought as he swam, it seems that there is no hope today. Why swim? Think like this, the limbs are getting more and more unable to row.

What about frog B? It thought, the weather is so bad today that it is impossible to go out. However, let's keep swimming and see, maybe there will be a way. Although his limbs were tired, he still insisted on swimming. When I was swimming, I thought, as long as I have strength, I will swim anyway. Just when it could hardly row, its hind leg hit a solid solid. It turns out that the butter has solidified under its constant agitation. Later, frog B stepped on butter, jumped out of the jar and went home alone.

The story of the little frog has another ending. Before the butter solidified, two frogs were exhausted in the jar. The two philosophers argued about this. A said, "Look, what's the use of self-confidence? It is also the end of death. " B said, "Indeed, they are all dead. But until the moment of death, frog A was sad and desperate, while frog B was full, at least not sad and desperate, because it had no time to be sad and desperate. "

Doesn't everyone have the same ending? Then, the difference between people lies in the difference of process.

1. Which philosopher do you agree with for the second result? Why?

2. Which ending do you prefer? Why? Please tell me your reasons. I have a better answer.