Usually: 7: 00 am-8: 00 am, afternoon 12:00- 13:00 pm, afternoon 17:30-22:00 pm, and submission is not recommended. Holidays: 16:00- 24: 00 can contribute. Such approval and initial accumulation consume idle time, and there are not many users in the morning. In this way, at two or three o'clock in the afternoon, you will find that the number of recommendations has suddenly increased, and the outbreak time just coincides with prime time. There are many people who watch it, and there are also many people who like it, collect it and have money. It will last until 12, and it's easy to play 10 thousand games.

Generally, review the video for a short time, within one minute, then one minute to five minutes, and finally more than five minutes. Bili Bili is reviewed in batches, and now it is faster than before. Now it's human and machine audit together. However, the investigation has been very strict recently, and it needs to wait a little longer. Within five minutes, if you don't catch up with the winter and summer vacations, you will basically finish the review within two hours, more than five minutes, within six hours.

Generally, the time for submitting for review is about 1~2 hours at the front desk. If it is submitted after 1 1 in the afternoon, the review speed will be relatively prolonged.

Expand:

Sci review cycle is generally about 4-6 months.

I. Introduction:

The review of sci papers goes through several steps: preliminary review, reviewer review, revision/rejection, rework review and final decision. The time to complete these steps is probably the time required for reviewing sci papers, and there is no uniform standard, which is related to the efficiency of reviewing journals and the quality of articles.

Second, the audit method:

1, preliminary examination: After the sci paper is submitted, it must go through preliminary examination first, which usually takes 1-2 weeks to complete. Of course, many articles will be rejected in the first trial.

2. Auditor's audit: The auditor's audit time mainly depends on the auditor, generally about 1-3 months. If the reviewers have great differences of opinion, they may be required to re-review, which takes longer than the results directly reviewed by the reviewers.

3. Revision/rejection: The rejected paper is equivalent to failing to pass the review of the journal. Papers that need to be revised need to be completed by the author according to the revision opinions. Modification is divided into minor repairs and major repairs, and major repairs take a long time. Generally speaking, the author has 1-3 months to make corrections. In addition, it is also possible to be hired directly, which can save time for revision and revision, but it is rare.

4. Revision and review: If the revised paper needs to be returned to the journal for re-review, it may take 1 month or longer. If there are two or three revisions, it will definitely take longer than one revision.

5. Final decision: After rework or repeated rework, there will be a final decision. If hired, the assessment is completed. If it is rejected, it means that the audit is not passed.

Third, the influencing factors:

The quality of the paper, the busyness of the journal, the author's response speed, etc. Among them, the quality of the paper and the author's reaction speed are the key factors. In this process, the author needs to reply to the reviewer's comments and suggestions as soon as possible to speed up the review of the paper.