Let the facts speak for themselves and let science and technology fully develop and grow in economic activities! The state should improve the salaries and social status of teachers and doctors, and provide excellent teachers with free or low-cost housing so that they can work without worries and make contributions to society.
Now it has become an industrial chain from writing papers, reviewing papers, recommending papers and publishing papers. Each link has its own routine, and the routine is very deep. Why do some people publish many papers a year, some people keep writing papers, and some students can't get past it because they cry for papers many times? After the examination and approval, the experts pointed out that you gave a thank-you fee or (benefit) after the maze? If you want to publish a paper in a journal, there are many routines. Famous and unknown people have different ways of publishing papers. Unknown papers can only be published in cooperation with authoritative sources. In other words, a large part of your invention has become someone else's, and there are also chaos such as helping people write papers, helping people pass the examination and approval, and helping people recommend publication.
Papers can support you to apply for projects, evaluate professional titles, check and accept projects, declare awards, and promote the transformation of scientific research results. It is an important measure to break the theory of only paper, and I look forward to landing as soon as possible. As long as there are papers, there will be awards, especially SCi awards. It has stopped now. Great! It is suggested that the linking of scientific research projects with professional titles should be stopped immediately, especially when individuals in national provinces and cities apply for approval, and work task indicators should be issued to subordinate business units by work indicators or other means, which will increase the workload at the grassroots level too much.
It is not enough to improve the treatment of all teachers. Should we reward those who have sent out a few useless papers? It is relatively easy to write good papers in some majors and fields, and some are relatively difficult. It is wrong to just look at the influencing factors of the paper across the board. Those who are really capable care about this vain research in colleges and universities, and those who can transform the results go to their own companies to make money.
Now colleges and universities have no direction at all, scientific research is the first, and teachers can teach in the classroom. A group of people who don't understand teaching are directing teaching blindly, and a group of graduate students and doctoral students who have not received professional training have stepped onto the platform, and they have not received corresponding training. Most university teachers don't know how to write the most basic lesson plans. Are engaged in so-called scientific research and writing papers.
State financial funds should not be used to reward the publication of papers. Individuals who publish papers have to spend their own money. If the paper is of high quality and can be transformed into scientific and technological products or achievements, it can be appropriately subsidized after being reviewed by domestic experts. Actually, it's not like this. The Science and Technology Department only said that articles could not be rewarded. Another way is to convert articles into workload, treat them equally with teaching work, and then divide the money according to the workload, so that teaching and scientific research can be paid equal attention. In the past, only scientific research was rewarded, not teaching.
The development of our country in recent years has scared the whole world, especially the United States. The main reason is the development of science and technology. The progress of science and technology is inseparable from the quantity and quality of papers. In the past two years, the United States has awakened and started to suppress it by hook or by crook. Without the cooperation of spies and lackeys, they can't help us. The terrible thing is that there are running dogs everywhere. If the main leaders of the country don't understand, it will be too late to react again, and the consequences will be unimaginable.
The knowledge in the textbook is the result of at least five years ago, and it is the result of regularity. If you don't do scientific research and stare at cutting-edge knowledge, the students you teach will definitely not keep up with the development direction of this professional era. Scientific research improves teachers' level, teaching level and students' cognition. Why a university is good or not depends on the number and quality of teachers who keep a close eye on the forefront of professional development.
Personally, I think that sending a paper can be a symbolic reward, such as not exceeding how much money a year, and the quality of the article needs to be controlled. The expression of scientific research achievements of researchers and university teachers originally needs articles, which is also an important part of their work. They don't need to unilaterally pursue article rewards, just do their jobs!
I think the main reason is that there is no shortage of countries. What is needed now is quality. If bonuses are awarded on the basis of papers, there will be a large number of irrigation papers focusing on short-term interests. Nobody wants to touch those high-tech topics. And if the paper itself is of high quality, it will bring a lot of collateral benefits. In addition, teachers' salaries are increasing year by year. The monthly salary of 600 million people 1k, and the salary of teachers is already considerable. Besides, you said that teachers all have feelings about home and country, so can teachers reward them with papers for not doing short-term utilitarian research and studying articles that the country really needs?
By the way, it is by no means a minority to reflect the behavior of college teachers occupying student papers and even occupying the first inventor of student patents. A considerable number of students will submit to humiliation in order to graduate smoothly, hoping to appeal for them!
Not only papers, but also quantity and quality; Not only SCI, but also quality, not only? Foreign publications? ; Now scholars all over the world publish articles in English, but one day, foreign scholars learn Chinese and publish articles in Chinese; There are many ways to express scientific research achievements, and the paper is just one of them. Making money by rewarding papers is not the original intention of scientific research. The investment in publishing papers can be calculated, and the research funds invested in papers are really huge and cannot be calculated. The same paper published in Chinese in China will have more readers and greater role.
One more thing, especially for ordinary colleges and universities, the cancellation of scientific research awards is a great blow to those who are willing to do scientific research! In fact, such colleges and universities lack the evaluation ability after "breaking four talents". It can be predicted that it is almost a devastating blow to the scientific research groups with weak strength in such colleges and universities! ! And ordinary colleges and universities actually account for the majority in China! !