As far as I'm concerned. I think the advantages of separating arts and sciences outweigh the disadvantages. Imagine that when we enter the society and work to make a living, not everyone chooses the same job, and their personal interests are different, which leads to different development directions for everyone, such as politics and scientific research. So when we are in the most critical three years, we should decide our own position. However, if we choose to divide all kinds into arts and sciences, it seems that there are two camps. In fact, there is no obvious cooperation and promotion between them. To be exact, they are all developing steadily. The so-called "biting off more than one can chew", if you study all nine subjects regardless of arts and sciences, it will only make students have poor academic performance, average grades and excellent grades, and it is difficult to choose the future.

It is good to divide the arts and sciences, but there is also a problem, that is to say, there are always more people choosing science than liberal arts; For a long time, it has caused a superficial phenomenon. I always feel that liberal arts are not as valued as science, and there are fewer colleges and universities than science colleges. However, studying literature or science will be used in the future industry. On the one hand, there can be no surplus or shortage. Although science gives people the feeling of "ousting a hundred schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone", it also promotes the competition between liberal arts students, greatly promotes academic progress and achieves a "win-win".

No matter studying literature or science, it will promote our specificity in future study and light the beacon for our future study.