Finally, after watching The Lord of the Rings's trilogy, tears still ran down my cheeks.

Tell me how I feel. Where do I start? I just feel a long-lost and full touch in my heart. It goes without saying that the whole film is magnificent, and fans all over the world will prove it. I just want to leave what it gave me, which can be said to be shocking. Shrouded in sacred glory. In order to defend their homeland, even if they fail, they will go forward and defend their land, people and dignity to the death, only for the glimmer of hope that still exists and only for the faith in their hearts. The princess finally said, "the time of mankind has come." She was brave and strong and saved herself and the whole world.

Warriors are fearless and stand in front to guide the people. They have many qualities. It can be said that it is this unity and firmness that gives us the courage to face it, and it is also the spirit that this film wants to convey, that is, as long as we have courage, hope will be endless. Dedicate oneself to the just cause.

In the process of watching the trilogy, I don't know how many times I shed tears, but most of them were because of Sam. In him, I saw loyal friendship, strength, and the belief of dying for my friends. The first time I shed tears was when Frodo was ready to embark on the road of Mordor alone. Sam held out his hand and said that he would follow me all the way. His true and innocent feelings never changed. When Frodo couldn't hold on to Mount Doom, Sam, who was also exhausted, said, "I can't take it, but I can take you." He carried his friend on his back, and he kept his promise to protect Frodo all the way, with no regrets. When Frodo suspected of abandoning him, he cried, but he finally saved his friend from the enemy. Sam, I was deeply moved. Perhaps, I was originally an impressionable person, but it was Sam who warmed my worldly indifference. True friendship is trust, dedication, loyalty and help. I think, in the end, Frodo's mind left the most friendship with Sam, which was the first and simplest life. Yes, for people like Sam, they should enjoy the beauty of life.

For me, I really like those four short hobbits. They don't have strong physique and can't charge like heroes. They can only go with the army and be protected, but their quality is not bad at all. None of them flinched because of fear, although they couldn't say they were brave. They protect their companions, live together, cherish each other and are honest and kind. It is they, the four humble dwarfs, who let the elves, kings and knights pay tribute to them, because they show us the best feelings of human beings and the hope of human beings. Shire's home is an ideal country, pinning our dreams and our home. Life in the shire is not only the favorite of the little Hobbit, but also our most yearning.

Get rid of inner panic, doubt and greed, and return to kindness and innocence when the world is not polluted. Our world is Charles' home.

1

Depending on how well you know J.R.R Tolkien, you will be bored or angry with The Lord of the Rings in Ralph Bakshi. Despite the lovely background and Baxi's always beautiful use of colors, this film is not the climax of Baxi's career. In fact, it is still remembered and reviled by many Tolkien fans, who are dissatisfied with Bakshi's handling of the first third of The Ring trilogy.

This resentment stems largely from The Lord of the Rings's unique position in fantasy literature. Unlike Howard's Deception or Lieber's Farfried and the Grey Mouse, The Ring trilogy is popular and accepted outside the fantasy community. Scholars respect Tolkien's poems and deep understanding of Celtic and Nordic myths. Hippies think this book is a fable and contains wisdom; War gamers have integrated Tolkien's world into the popular Dungeons and Dragons adventure game. Tolkien may be the last outstanding writer with many followers before Stephen King, and his works are of great significance to many people. His fantasy world is based on semi-forgotten legends, with logic and beliefs that few people can match.

Bakshi did not try to meet this high demand, but provided a film equivalent to various posters and calendars based on Tolkien's works. From the visual point of view, this work is the gorgeous fantasy illustration in the 1970s. This is also an incredibly shallow work, and writing in such a way will confuse a non-Tolkien fan. For example, the design of the nazgul is very similar to that of the orcs-they are all black, with horns and red eyes. However, the nazgul is a more unique and deadly opponent (only nine such evil spirits exist). When the nazgul is described as unstoppable evil, and the orcs are easily killed, the audience will be confused. Similarly, three of the four Hobbits are painted almost exactly the same, which makes it difficult for the audience to distinguish the protagonists. Gollum appeared in the last third of the film, in fact, there was no introduction, just like a tree man. Bakshi assumes that you have read these books, so you spend little time on characterization. In retrospect, this strategy is familiar to fans of Japanese deformed children, but it does not make it any less lazy than in the 1970 s. Many British accents in the film are precious, which makes the conversation more boring ("In the name of the whole shire, you will have neither a ring nor me!") )

Naturally, like any Bakshi film, there are sporadic brilliant moments. Gandalf's imprisonment in the Saruman Tower, various battle scenes, early scenes of the ring, and Frodo's dance in the pub all come to mind. These are still dazzling. Unfortunately, too many human characters (especially Aragon and Boromir) are too simple to interest us. The soundtrack of this film was fascinating at first, but it soon became repetitive. Bakshi decided to end the film when there were still two-thirds of the story, which made the audience dissatisfied. Bakshi has never made a proposed sequel.

2

In the first few minutes of the first chapter of this undeniable epic trilogy, the audience was breathless by the dense images on the screen. We still have nearly three hours.

The scope of Tolkien's masterpiece may have puzzled filmmakers for decades, but director Peter Jackson kept his promise: he not only brought us the story of Frodo and his brave companions, but also brought us Middle-earth. Trust me, it's big. The broad prospect and the camera lens hanging on the seat let us shuttle through Tolkien's imaginary towering cities and castles.

But what is more impressive than amazing visual effects and unheard-of sound effects is the actors who inject life into their characters. Gandalf played by Ian McKellen is simply awesome, while Frodo played by Elijah Wood is one of the most unexpected and charming performances I have seen for a long time. Despair, fear and determination of fellowship are all there, no doubt. I left the theater in pain ... straining every muscle in the fighting and flying scenes-we haven't seen such a suffocating and convincing scene since Spielberg made us rush to the beach on D-Day.

Those unfamiliar with Tolkien's world may soon find themselves lost in it, but they are glad to do so. The depth of his creation can not be grasped in a few hours, and it is not needed; The struggle between good and evil broke out on the screen, and there was almost no room for complaint.

At the end of the film, the audience sat on the edge of their seats and felt a little lost. We are exhausted, but no one wants to wait another year.

Jackson's ambitious first chapter is really unlike anything you have seen this year. Attention, george lucas and chris columbus: This is how you fulfill your movie promise.