First, read the original text of Zhi. The feeling of Tao after reading is caused by reading, which is the basis of feeling. At first glance, you may not be able to grasp what the original says. How can you have a "feeling"? Reading is superficial, of course I don't feel profound. Only by reading carefully can we feel something and feel deeply. If you want to read an argumentative essay, you must find out its arguments (opinions and propositions), or criticize any wrong opinions, think about what you are inspired by, and find out what the arguments and conclusions are. If it is a narrative, it is necessary to find out its main plot, how many characters there are, what is the relationship between them, and the year when the story happened. The social background involved in the work, but also to find out what kind of spiritual quality the work reveals, what kind of social phenomenon it reflects, what thoughts and feelings the author expresses, which chapters of the work are touching, why it is so touching and so on.
Second, be friendly. As long as you read the original text carefully, an article can be written in many ways. If you have a deep feeling about the center of the original text, you can write it as a post-reading feeling, a post-reading feeling about other contents of the original text, or a post-reading feeling about individual sentences. In short, as long as it is the original content, as long as you have feelings about it, you can write it as a comment.
Third, choose the right point. An article can express many feelings, but a comment can only talk about one center and must not cover everything. Therefore, the next step is to screen and compare these many feelings, find out the one that you feel the deepest, the latest angle, the most realistic pertinence and the fluency when writing, as the center of review, and then demonstrate it in writing.
Fourth, the narrative should be simple. Since the feeling after reading is caused by reading, it is necessary to describe the facts that cause "feeling" in the article, and sometimes describe some examples that I think of. In short, after reading it, "Syria" is indispensable. But it is different from the requirement of "narration" in narration. The narrative in narrative pays attention to concrete, vivid and vivid, while the narrative in reading comprehension pays attention to conciseness and conciseness, and does not require "touching", but only reasonable and well-founded. After reading the original text, a beginner feels that the narrative is not short, but actually becomes a retelling. This is mainly because the author can't grasp the spirit and main points of the part to be quoted, so he can't be concise. Concise, not as few words as possible, but also concise.