Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - What is misogyny?
What is misogyny?
What is misogyny?

& gt& gt

They only regard women as props to vent their desires. No matter which woman has nude, miniskirt and other "female symbols", they can respond, like Pavlov's dog drooling when he hears the bell, which is really shocking. If there is no such mechanism in men, the sex industry will not be established.

◆ Jixing Shunsuke and Kafka Gai Na

How can you completely expose yourself to someone you don't trust? Sex should be based on love, and love can't tolerate any sand.

& gt A depressed wage earner was desperate, so he went to a prostitute and vented "feelings similar to anger" on a woman. In fact, prostitutes exist for the convenience of venting "anger-like emotions"

A plot to cover up men's desires!

& gt Men's desire is thus relieved.

& gt& gt edward said defined Orientalism as "the western model that dominates, rebuilds and conquers the East" and "the western knowledge system about what the East is". Therefore, no matter how many books written by westerners about the East are read, they only know the oriental fantasy in the eyes of westerners, not the real East-this is the discovery of Said's book Orientalism (1978).

A man who runs away from a woman

haha

& gt Yoshiyuki's works are irritating to read, but they can also be read in a different way as texts suitable for male sexual fantasies. In this way, Ji Xing's book has become an amazing and naked good teaching material to reveal the true face of men, and the angry and disgusting reading experience has also become a learning reading behavior. In fact, if you don't change your mind like this, what most men write can't be read calmly.

& gt& gt It is right to say that male writers don't understand women, but write about real women and women. However, as a criticism of male writers, it didn't get to the point. What we should do is to reveal the structure of "dreams about women" held by male writers when they weave the inner world of men through critical analysis. Male writers pin their dreams on women at will and explain them at will. It is the great difference between the dream woman and the real woman that they describe that makes men's inner scenery more colorful. [Paddy field, 1993: 75] I regard this passage as the sharpest criticism of our On Male Literature. Although men describe women, they are actually talking about themselves. As the title of this article shows, Shuitian interprets modern Japanese male literature with two key words: "fleeing to women" and "fleeing from women". This model may be a bit too bold, but it's a big discovery that I find very enlightening. Shui Tian said that the "woman" in modern male literature (not a real woman, but a woman as a symbol of fetishism, so it is quoted) is a private space that constitutes a man's inner world. Men seek the space of "women" in order to escape from the public world, but they meet real women there and find that the other person is an unreasonable and unpleasant other, so they try to escape from there. Whether this kind of escape is "escape from home" or "escape home" depends on the time and place. "Running away from home" is easy to understand, but after running away, they found another other who could not satisfy their dreams, so they ran away again. After this explanation, people can understand many private novels of modern male writers. Ji Xing's works are nothing more than this type.

> > To "otherize" women is actually to classify women into the category of "otherness" that they can control. This otherness is both charming and contemptuous. Whether you worship as a "saint" or insult as a "bitch", they are two sides of the same coin. It is said that Guan Gen graduated from Ji Xing because he fell in love with an American woman and got married. Because this woman from different cultures has always insisted that "I am not the other you want". The other here is the real "other", which can neither be understood nor controlled, and is a completely different monster from himself.

◆ Conditions for the establishment of a man's bond

& gt& gt So men's homosexual social desire is maintained by homophobia. The mechanism of confirming male subjectivity is to objectify women. Taking women as the object of sex, mutual recognition and unity can be established between the subjects of sex. "Having (at least one) woman" is the condition for becoming a sexual subject. The word "own" is very accurate. The proof of "being like a man" is to put a woman under your control. "I can't even make my wife obey me, what man!" This standard is still valid today. Therefore, misogyny means never treating women as the same sex subject as yourself, but objectifying and otherizing women. More directly, it is discrimination and contempt.

The homosexual social desire of men is based on misogyny and maintained by homophobia. This is a wonderful theory that sedgwick taught us.

& gt& gt This in turn proves how fragile this man is.

◆ Have men been talking about sex?

& gt& gt Men's assimilation and exclusion in order to become men cannot be accomplished by one person alone. Sociologist Sato Yu pointed out sharply in On Discrimination [2005] that "discrimination needs three people". His definition of discrimination can be slightly modified as follows: discrimination is the act of assimilating one person with another person who acts in the same way. If "one person" in front is replaced by "woman" and "another person" in the back is replaced by "man", it will directly become the definition of "gender discrimination".

& gt& gt has deviated from the world of men and is equivalent to "feminine men" under the stubborn gender binary system that does not allow the existence of the item.

◆ Gender, race and class

& gt& gt Said defined Orientalism concisely as "the knowledge system about what the East is in the western world". Orientalism is another name for westerners' fantasy about what the East is, what it should be and what it hopes to be. Therefore, no matter how much you know about Orientalism, you still know nothing about the real "East", but what you know is the East in the eyes of Westerners.

& gt& gt In recent ethnic studies, race, like gender, is a product of historical construction, which has become common sense. Humans belong to a genus. No matter who they are, 99% of their DNA is the same, but they are determined to create the concept of "race" to distinguish people by skin color. The so-called "gender" is a device to maintain the dividing line by excluding "non-men" (men and women who failed to become men) and let men realize their subjectivity as men. Similarly, the so-called "race" is a device by which whites (the people who invented the concept of race) define "what is white" by excluding "non-whites". White's research [Fujikawa, 2005] revealed these truths one by one. "Being white" means having the qualification to rule inferior races. Historically, the concept of race appeared at the same time as the ideology of imperialism ruling the world.

Separation and domination of "saints" and "prostitutes"

& gt& gt As I said in the previous two chapters, in order to become the subject of sex, men deeply root their contempt for women in the core of self-confirmation, which is misogyny. Homophobia, on the other hand, can be understood as men's uneasy fear of blurred boundaries between men and women. Men must constantly prove that they are not "men like women"

& gt& gt However, this misogyny has a fatal weakness, and that is the mother. Openly insulting the woman who gave birth to her will lead to a spiritual crisis of her birth and identity. So in fact, misogyny is not only a contempt for women, but also another aspect of women worship. Is this a contradiction? The double standard of sex tells us that this is actually not contradictory.

& gt& gt The so-called double standard of sex means that the sexual morality for men is different from that for women. For example, men's lewdness is affirmative (such as JiXing Junsuke, Kafka Gai Na, etc. ), and women take sexual ignorance and purity as a good thing. On the surface, modern monogamy advocates "equal chastity", but in fact, men's "foul" has been included in the system from the beginning (since they can't abide by it, don't swear at the beginning), so they should act as women who are the "foul objects" of men. Therefore, the double standards of gender divide women into two categories. That is, the common dichotomy between "saint" and "slut", "wife and mother" and "prostitute", "married object" and "playmate", "laity woman" and "expert woman" (women in the sex industry-translators). In reality, every living woman has a body and soul, a uterus and a vagina. However, "a woman born for reproduction" is deprived of happiness and alienated into only for reproduction; A "woman who pursues happiness" is committed to happiness, not reproduction. Prostitutes with children are disappointing because they disturb this boundary.

& gt& gt Of course, happiness here is men's unilateral happiness, and men don't need to care about women's happiness.