As the name implies, comment-comment-opinion.
In other words, we should first point out the advantages and disadvantages of the other party, then give the final result or compensation point according to the advantages and disadvantages, and finally give some guidance and suggestions to the other party as an expert.
Question 2: How to fill in the comprehensive evaluation opinions and evaluation reports of the three units participating in the bidding of this project, and the qualification and compliance inspection all meet the requirements of the bidding documents? After a detailed review of the bidding documents of the three bidders, the opinions are as follows:
1、
2、
3、
After comprehensive evaluation, the scores and rankings of all bidders are as follows:
According to the requirements of comprehensive evaluation and bidding documents, it is suggested that:
The first successful candidate:
Second successful candidate:
Question 3: How to write the evaluation opinions and conclusions of the bid evaluation experts * * * * There are _ _ _ _ _ bidders who participated in the bidding of this project, namely: ———————————————————————————.
In the preliminary review, the compliance and completeness of the bidding documents of _ _ _ _ bidders meet the requirements of the bidding documents, and enter the detailed review. The situation is as follows: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Through comprehensive evaluation, the scores and rankings of all bidders are as follows: ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
According to the above review results and the relevant provisions of the tender documents, it is suggested that:
Candidate marker for the first arc marker:
Second successful candidate:
Question 4: There is no need for a fixed format for how to write contract review opinions.
I suggest you look at the terms of the contract, give audit opinions one by one, and then write a comprehensive opinion at the end.
Question 5: How to write my previous doctoral thesis according to the evaluation opinions of my dissertation? The reviewer wrote it according to the abstract in my paper, and it will be OK if it is refined. There should be some innovations written by yourself in the self-criticism book. You can refer to it Leonshane (station contact TA) first makes a brief summary of this paper, pointing out its main clues: research purpose, method, significance, innovation and so on. And then point out one or two biggest problems. If the problem is really fatal, it is recommended to modify it for a long time. Your tutor will check it for you after you finish it. If he doesn't study, I suggest you apply for a new tutor. . . Shuoyeb (station contact TA) 1. General evaluation project: the academic value and application value of the innovation achievements of the paper. The paper reflects the author's basic theory and professional level. 2. Comprehensive evaluation of all reviewers' academic comments on the paper (significance of topic selection, innovative achievements of the paper, academic value and application value, rationality and reliability of experimental results and calculated data, etc.). ) ... 3. Problems, deficiencies, opinions or suggestions in the paper. 2.....LBH535 (sTAtion contact ta) audit opinions should be combined point by point. The surface is the general situation, and the point at least reflects whether the reviewer has read the content carefully. At present, many papers are in the first instance, especially in social sciences. The comments are so general that people feel that they have not read them carefully. Qiu Qu _2002 12 (contact TA in the station) suggested to reply, and then simply write some comments. K 1000 1 (in-sTAtion contact ta) There is also an eight-part essay: The thesis shows that * * * has mastered a solid and extensive basic theory and systematic and in-depth professional knowledge in the research field, and has (strong) independent ability to engage in scientific research, and the thesis (innovation) has reached the academic level of doctoral thesis. It is suggested to organize doctoral thesis defense. If there is a prompt in the nono2009 (Station Contact TA) review form, you can write a review opinion according to several items required by the prompt. Songjm 12 (conTAct ta in the station) read the requirements of the first two pages of the evaluation book and write a comment. Is the research question clear, the research goal clear, the method appropriate and the result obvious? Is the workload full and the content substantial? Wait, the best way is to find an old doctoral thesis and copy it down. Stereotyped writing ~ ~
Question 6: How to write the review of the paper? Please refer to the following aspects to evaluate the quality of the paper. You can refer to the following evaluation criteria: (1) Thesis topic and abstract: it is of theoretical significance or practical value to the national economy, scientific and technological social practice, whether it is widely read, whether it is comprehensive, and whether it grasps the domestic and international trends (20%); (2) Basic theory and professional knowledge: whether there is theoretical analysis and experimental verification, whether the demonstration is accurate, whether the results are outstanding, whether the workload is sufficient, and whether there is a solid and broad basic theory and systematic and in-depth professional knowledge (30%); (3) scientific research ability and creativity: whether there are new ideas, arguments and achievements reflect strong scientific research ability and creativity. (40%); (4) Writing ability: whether the organization is clear, whether the level is clear, whether the paper format is standardized, and whether the style of study is rigorous (10%).
Question 7: How to write the expert review opinions? Please wait a moment, I'll send it to you now.
Question 8: How to write the conclusion of contract review? Make an assessment of various risks and give your suggestions with the lowest risk!