At present, associate senior titles need papers to be published, but not all professional reviews will require journals to be at the core level. This should be based on their own professional evaluation needs to choose the journal of the paper. As long as the general deputy senior is published in regular journals, the number of papers will be required.

Is the periodical whose title is published, a sub-high, a core periodical?

When publishing sub-senior thesis topics, we should pay attention to the following aspects when choosing journals:

1. Consistency between submission logs and papers

The first question in choosing a journal is how relevant the journal is to the paper. It is suggested to find out the latest 3 or 4 issues of periodicals and confirm which topics each issue pays attention to. In addition, we should carefully look at how the structure of papers published in such journals is composed and written.

When choosing the final submission journals, it is suggested to look for papers that are closely related to your own papers, and look back at which journals have published papers according to substantive issues, methods and ways of use, paper structure and paper structure.

2. The impact factor and citation index must be high.

Because the evaluation criteria of impact factors and these criteria may not be directly related to the quality of papers, it has caused a lot of controversy to judge the quality of journals by impact factors. Even so, the impact factor is still the only basic method to judge the quality and reputation of periodicals. Although it is everyone's goal to publish papers in journals with high impact factors, the most important thing is to objectively judge the research results and confirm whether they really meet the standards of first-class journals. If you don't do this, you will probably continue to modify different periodical formats and submit papers, wasting your precious time.

3. Choose journals according to individual needs.

One of the concerns is to choose whether to invest in professional journals or general journals. Because it is impossible to know whether the paper will arouse the interest of general journal editors and reviewers before submission, everyone may have different results. Most general journals have high impact factors, so many authors still tend to submit papers to general journals, even though they know that this is not the most suitable method for them. After receiving an avalanche of rejection letters, most authors will transfer their target journals to professional fields. Although this is a natural yield strategy, it is also easy to produce the opposite effect. At first, the author voted for general journals, but was inevitably rejected and switched to professional journals. The submission process is long and anxious. Therefore, please avoid using this method and seriously consider who will be interested in your paper. If it is found that the paper can only arouse some readers' interest in this field after judgment, find the most suitable journal to contribute.

Reference website: Web page links