Macro principle of length
The macro principle is to meet the requirements related to the quality of manuscripts in the Quality Standard for Academic Journals of Press and Publication. Mainly:
Political standards. It can be summarized as five aspects: observing the Constitution and laws; adhering to the Party's basic line; observing the Party's propaganda discipline; and implementing national, religious and foreign policies. , safeguard national interests; Abide by the principles, policies and regulations of press and publication: follow the purpose of running a magazine and implement the principle of "choose one from two" and "let a hundred flowers blossom".
(2) business standards. It can be summarized into three aspects: reflecting the hot spots of subject research: integrating theory with practice, paying attention to and solving practical problems, consulting policy and management departments; The role of writing quality conforms to the writing norms, with clear main arguments, sufficient arguments, rigorous concepts and logic, and no self-contradiction and self-defense. At the same time, it abides by standardized standards such as digital use, labeling and references.
2. The golden mean
The meso-principle is to highlight the characteristics of periodicals under the premise of following the macro-principle, and it is also the concretization of the macro-principle.
(1) Politically, we should adhere to the Four Cardinal Principles and correctly handle the relationship between political issues and academic issues. Any academic issues involving political issues shall not violate the four cardinal principles of the Party on the grounds of school research, and the research on any academic issues shall not conflict with the current major policies and shall not harm the interests of the country and the nation. Shall not violate the provisions and spirit of the copyright law and other legal norms.
(2) academically, it must be exploratory and pioneering, or have new depth and excavation. Mainly: open up new research fields, put forward new theories and viewpoints, use new methods and explore new materials. The discussion of old topics has reached a new depth, or new practical problems have been explained with existing theories, which has provided theoretical suggestions for the current reform and construction practice. Put forward contending opinions on the research conclusions of your own research and draw new conclusions. Starting from the journal as a whole, we must pay equal attention to basic theory and applied research when reviewing and selecting manuscripts. Journals should reflect local major issues and social hot issues at that time, but they must be reflected in the form of academic theoretical research results, rather than general propaganda content. We can't draw general conclusions in the name of major topics.
(3) Writing must conform to all writing norms, and at the same time, it is not allowed to repeat general theoretical knowledge and basic principles. Any manuscript that repeats a lot of unnecessary general principles and basic knowledge without much new ideas is unqualified or defective.
3. Microscopic principle
The microscopic principle is the peer review principle based on the individuality of periodicals. Mainly includes:
(1) According to the professional characteristics and discipline advantages of our college, we will determine our own special principles of peer review. In particular, we should focus on selecting manuscripts with academic advantages in our college, which not only improves the quality of the journal, but also helps to make it unique.
(2) Starting from the columns set by the inherent characteristics of the journal, carefully select relevant manuscripts. Most of the columns of the journal are based on the professional characteristics and subject advantages of our college. So this principle is related to the previous principle, but it is not completely consistent. For example, according to the characteristics of current theoretical research or a certain tendency of academic research, the columns sometimes involve various disciplines. As the focus of periodicals, columns are relatively fixed in a certain period of time. In addition, periodicals can also determine the immediate focus of a periodical according to the situation at that time, and determine the principle of priority reading and selection according to this focus, which is a microscopic principle.
(3) Starting from the establishment and consolidation of the author team and the cultivation of young academic talents, establish the principle that famous scholars and key academic newcomers in this discipline give priority to reviewing manuscripts and selecting manuscripts.
Second, the review requirements
After receiving the manuscript, reviewers and scholars should review the manuscript according to the following requirements:
(a) a comprehensive evaluation of the papers submitted for review
Please review the paper mainly from the following aspects.
1. The ideological content of the paper.
Whether the article conforms to the four cardinal principles and the party's principles and policies.
2. The scientific nature of the paper. Please judge the scientific nature of the paper from the aspects of topic selection, guiding ideology, arguments and argumentation process.
3. The reliability and accuracy of the paper.
Please evaluate whether the sources of information and data are reliable, whether the materials are used reasonably, whether the topic is relevant, and whether the written expression is accurate and smooth.
(2) point out the mistakes in the text one by one in detail, please correct individual intellectual mistakes with a pencil.
(three) clearly written opinions on the handling of the manuscript. Handling opinions include adoption, adoption after modification, and rejection depending on the modification.