If you want to write a good theoretical article, you must first understand the nature and characteristics of the theoretical article. Theoretical articles are written to study a theoretical problem, discuss a certain truth and express personal opinions, and are an important means to publicize the party's theory, line, principles and policies. Such as comments, essays, investigation reports, experiences, etc. are all categories of theoretical articles. Specifically, it has four characteristics. Namely, reality, politics, theory and logic.
Reality and politics are the remarkable characteristics that distinguish theoretical articles from academic papers. Theoretical articles serve to explore and solve various social problems in real life, and also directly serve politics. Integrating theory with practice is its lifeline. It is the value of the theoretical article to provide the basis for the decision-making of leading organs.
Theory and logic. In order to convince people by reasoning, theoretical articles must use formal logic and dialectical logic to judge and reason. Convince people with reason, convince people with reason, convince people with reason. This is its logic.
Rules and requirements of theoretical article writing
Choose the correct topic of the article. Writing an article and choosing the right topic is the first thing. Theme is the core and soul of the article. Of course, it is not difficult to determine the theme of the article. Choosing a theme and extracting the core content of this theme is the theme of an article. The difficulty lies in whether this theme is correct, novel and practical.
To draw up a concise title, we should not only accurately grasp the problem, but also pay attention to written expression, and strive to be accurate, concise, distinctive and distinctive. In addition, the subtitle in the text of the article is also particular. Don't be too long, try to be short, powerful and neat, make people look beautiful, easy to read and remember, and condense the essence.
Among them, introduction is to ask questions and arouse people's thinking, thus leading to orthodoxy. Orthodoxy is to analyze the problem, around the theme, one layer at a time, one aspect at a time to prompt the essence and crux of the problem. The conclusion is to solve the problem, is the natural continuation of orthodox theory, and is the conclusion after argumentation, that is, the conclusion.