Most of the heroes people worship are successful.
Heroes, but failed heroes are not uncommon. During the Three Kingdoms period, both Liu Bei and Sun Quan failed in the end, but according to what they did, people still called them heroes. Guan defeated Maicheng and lost his life, but later generations lost their lives because of him.
Noble and brave, he is still called a warrior and has become the most representative hero. Yue Fei, an anti-gold hero, was framed by a traitor in the imperial court, and was finally killed in Fengbo Pavilion on charges of "unwarranted", but he had no time to make contributions.
Generations have called him a hero. Which of these people is not our hero? It can be seen that in people's minds, what matters is not their success or failure, but what they have done and which.
Is the key to being called a hero.
A true hero, even if he fails, loses with boldness of vision, heroic pride and image. Only in this way can people call him a hero. Zhuge Liang, who "died without conquering", went out of Qishan six times and captured Meng seven times before his death.
Get,
The Northern Expedition failed and he died of illness. Before he died, he left his men three pieces of advice, including emergency strategies. He was called a hero because he thought about his country before and after his death. "Who hasn't died in life since ancient times, keep Dan Xin.
According to historical records, Wen Tianxiang was an excellent anti-Yuan general, but after being captured in battle failure, he would rather die than surrender and was finally killed by the enemy. He wrote a tragic history with integrity and life, so he was also called a hero by later generations. It can be seen that the hero in failure must have made a feat different from other losers in order to be called a hero by future generations.
Heroes are not just about success or failure. Winners are heroes, and losers are not necessarily heroes. Apart from my subjective factors, there may be objective conditions for success; On the other hand, failure is also subjective.
It is determined by two objective factors and conditions. Therefore, we must not say that losers are not heroes just because of their failure. The standard of evaluating a hero should be what he has done, and the hero in the dictionary is like this.
Defined as "a brave man" and "a man who fought bravely for the interests of the people despite difficulties, admirable", the standard for measuring heroes here clearly shows that there is no such condition as success or failure. Therefore, if we only talk about heroes by success or failure, we will get the basic concept of heroes wrong, and the consequences are likely to make many heroes lose the election in human history.
Although everyone wants to succeed, failure is often inevitable. As long as you don't regard success or failure as a hero in your heart and do your own thing in a down-to-earth manner, you also have a chance to become a hero.