Interpretation belongs to the art of broadcasting, and broadcasting is nothing more than the art of speaking. No matter how it changes, it is inseparable from this essence. Just like we usually talk, logical people talk to express their views and seek * * *. Therefore, the key to sports commentary is two "viewpoints" and "* * *", and the technical term in related papers is called agenda setting of sports commentary.
And "expressing opinions for * * *" has the following problems in the logical order.
1. What views have been expressed?
B, how to express opinions?
C. how to connect ideas in series?
First of all, for sports commentary, the most critical thing is often not on-site commentary, which has been tested in the selection of commentators, and it is not a problem. Therefore, the most important thing for a commentator is the preparation before the game. Because the competition among American commentators is fierce, all your commentators will tell you the importance of preparation. And the preparation work determines what angle you will explain the game.
Secondly, how to express opinions. I am very grateful to Mr. Zhu of Shanghai Institute of Physical Education for introducing the theories of narratology and communication into sports commentary, especially the introduction of "field", which made the commentator have a clearer understanding. What is a "field"? That is to say, what kind of situation should the commentator put himself in when explaining? In the studio, the narrator not only talks to the people in the studio, but also talks to the audience. Live commentary is even less likely to be just a commentator. Therefore, what kind of explanation atmosphere the commentator should create, let the audience accept your way of speaking and arouse the audience's feelings with reasonable language, which is what the commentator needs to think about. (refer to zizhong emperor! )
Finally, it is about the actual operation. Although it is not pleasant to hear, it is indeed a request made by many commentators. To be a commentator is to have the ability to say positive is negative and black is white. First of all, most of the audience's understanding of the game is naturally far behind that of the commentator (whether at home or abroad. ), but the mood of public opinion will make the audience have a one-sided view, so when the commentator's explanation conflicts with the audience's general view, but it can't be explained clearly in a short time, it is necessary to test the basis and choice of the commentator. This will eventually lead to the commentator's point of view will continue to be divorced from the original logic, which is the time to test the commentator's logical thinking and language organization ability.
But all this comes from the initial preparation. But let's be clear, apart from Mr. Zhang Weiping, domestic commentators are not fully qualified for this position.