1, excellent (90- 100)

(1) The thesis is good in topic selection, rich in content, comprehensive in application of learned professional knowledge, correct in viewpoint of raising questions, incisive and thorough in analysis, and has certain application value, unique insights and distinctive innovations.

(2) The materials are typical and true, with analysis.

(3) The structure of the paper is rigorous, the arts and sciences are fluent, the level is clear, the language is concise, the writing is fluent, the handwriting is neat, and the chart is correct, clear and standardized.

(4) The references are mainly master's papers and core journal papers in recent three years.

(5) The research ideas are clear, the design is reasonable, the methods are appropriate, and the application tools are clear.

(6) The results are reasonable and clear.

(7) Answer questions correctly, comprehensively and profoundly, give full play to them, and speak clearly and fluently.

2, good (80-89 points)

(1) The thesis has a good topic, and can apply the professional theoretical knowledge learned to practice, and can raise and analyze problems. It has strong representativeness, certain personal opinions and practicality, and has certain theoretical depth.

(2) The materials are real and specific, and have strong representativeness. The analysis of the material is full and convincing, but not thorough enough.

(3) The paper has a rigorous structure, clear levels, standardized writing, clear organization, fluent writing, neat handwriting, correct and clear charts and accurate figures.

(4) Answering questions in the defense is basically correct and to the point, and the spoken language is relatively clear.

3. Medium (70-79 out of 100 100).

(1) The thesis has good topic selection, substantial content and certain analytical ability.

(2) independently completed, the argument is correct, but the argument is insufficient or the reasoning is not thorough, and the discussion on the nature of the problem is not deep enough.

(3) Specific materials, reasonable structure, clear hierarchy, strong logic and good expressive ability. The chart is basically correct and the operation is basically accurate.

(4) Answering questions in the defense is basically clear, and there are no mistakes in principle.

4. Qualified (60-69, full mark 100)

(1) The topic of the paper is general, and it is basically to analyze and solve problems with professional knowledge. The viewpoint is basically correct and basically completed independently, but the content is not substantial and the innovation is not enough.

(2) The materials are specific, and the investigation and research methods have been preliminarily mastered, and the original materials can be preliminarily processed.

(3) The article is organized, but the structure is flawed; The argument can basically explain the problem and make a general analysis of the materials, but it is thin and lacks the depth of excavation of the materials, and the argument is not sufficient and comprehensive.

(4) The text expression is basically clear, the text is basically fluent, the chart is basically correct, and there is no major data error.

(5) Answering questions in the defense is still clear, and mistakes can be corrected after being prompted.

5. Unqualified (less than 60 points out of 100)

Any paper with one of the following problems will be considered unqualified:

(1) There are serious mistakes in the viewpoint of the article.

(2) There are arguments that ignore the evidence, or mechanically copy the ideas in textbooks and reference books and fail to digest and absorb them.

(3) Off-topic or copying other people's articles for a long time, resorting to fraud.

(4) Lack of actual survey data, empty content, confused logic, unclear expression and unreasonable sentences.

(5) there is a principled error in answering questions in the defense, which cannot be corrected in time after being prompted.