2. Culturally, human cloning is a substitute and negation of natural reproduction, which breaks the self-discipline of biological evolution and has a typical anti-natural nature. Contrary to the basic cultural trend of advocating harmony between man and nature and returning to nature.
3. Philosophically speaking, after human beings achieve self-replication and self-reproduction through cloning technology, it may lead to the disorder of human body-mind relationship. People's unrepeatable and irreplaceable personality rules have lost their uniqueness and the natural basis and biological premise of themselves and their personality characteristics because of a large number of copies.
4. Blood birth constitutes the social structure and social relations. Why are almost all different countries and races opposed to human cloning? The reason is that it is another birth mode. Nowadays, the education of children from single-parent families has attracted much attention, that is, paying attention to an emotional cultivation problem. People's growth is completed in the state of bisexual reproduction and parental rearing. It has been like this for thousands of years. How should society respond to the emergence of human cloning? What should be the relationship between cloned people and cloned people?
5. Identity and social rights are indistinguishable. What if one day, 20 sons suddenly come to share your property, and their fingerprints and genes are the same? Is it necessary to engrave the marks such as Clone Sichuan A000 1 and Clone Sichuan A0002 on the forehead like the license plate photo to identify it?
6. Those who may support human cloning have a point: to solve the problem of infertility. But the next generation cloned by infertile people will still be infertile.
7. You think you are excellent. Except for your blood type, appearance, fingerprints and genes, the personality and behavior of cloned people may be completely different. Can you guarantee that the cloned people are as good as you and will not go astray?
8. In the research of human cloning, if there is abnormality, the defective cloned human can't be disposed of at will like cloned animals, which is also a trouble. Therefore, in the current environment, not only the concept and system, but also the whole social structure do not know how to accept human cloning.
9. According to the data, the cloned organism has premature aging, and Dolly also has premature aging, so she has passed away.
10. Life is not precious! ! !
1 1. Disadvantages of cloning: For the ethical circle, human cloning is related to a very serious ethical issue, because it violates the basic principles of ethics, such as the principle of no harm, the principle of autonomy, and the principle of equality.
3. Is human cloning good news or bad omen?
The topic of "human cloning" has been a research hotspot in the scientific community in recent years, but it has caused extensive and fierce controversy in all fields of society.
Supporters are full of confidence: "human cloning" technology can make infertile patients in Qian Qian realize their parents' wishes; Can let those relatives who have lost their flesh and blood relive their family happiness; Can find new treatments for many incurable diseases; It can create huge material wealth and social benefits ... in short, it is a new dawn for the scientific, medical and all mankind.
Opponents believe that the emergence of "human cloning" will have a great impact on the family structure and ethical system of the existing society; Will become a tool for terrorists to commit crimes; Making a large number of "clones" with the same genetic structure may induce the widespread spread of new diseases; As far as the current technology is concerned, the safety of "cloning" cannot be guaranteed, and there may be adverse results such as abortion, premature birth, stillbirth and deformity. Sharp critics say that scientists may create hundreds of deformed children before creating a healthy "clone".
Who are the supporters? People of insight pointed out that, first of all, I am afraid that some ambitious scientists are bent on becoming pioneers in "creating a new era in the history of human fertility." Secondly, when pushing some powerful pharmaceutical companies and other enterprises, they took a fancy to the huge profits that "human cloning" will bring, and risked being severely punished by the government to provide experimental places and funds for scientists; In addition, there must be a "handful of people" who support "human cloning" with ulterior motives, even including crazy politicians and terrorists who want to rule the world. Finally, I'm afraid it's just some couples who suffer from infertility, or their flesh and blood died before the childbearing age, because at the current level of scientific development, there is no only "clone" to treat infertility.
Who are the opponents? In fact, at present, the voice against human cloning has been the mainstream. Among the opponents, governments are the most powerful and restrictive. 1998 In early 1998, an American scientist named Richard Sid took the lead in proposing to carry out human cloning experiments, with the aim of breeding offspring for infertile couples. This was the beginning of the rumor of "human cloning". At that time, Russia, Britain and other countries passed laws prohibiting human cloning, and offenders would be severely punished; Many international organizations, such as UNESCO, the World Health Organization and the International Committee on Human Genetics and Ethics, also expressed clear opposition. France, Italy and other European countries quickly signed an agreement to strictly prohibit human cloning. The mainstream opinion in the scientific community is also firmly opposed; Religious circles, especially Catholicism, hold high the highest banner of opposition, because "human cloning" refers to people creating themselves instead of God, which runs counter to the ethical standards advocated by Catholicism. The latest reaction comes from Germany and France. As soon as Antinori announced that it would clone human beings, the German and French governments immediately discussed with UN Secretary-General Annan that the UN should formulate a global agreement to ban human cloning. The European Commission immediately issued a statement resolutely opposing human cloning.
I hope it will help you a little.