This depends on the author's actual situation, and there is no uniform time standard. Because if the reviewer proposes to reject the manuscript because of misunderstanding or mistake, he can summarize his views to the editor and cannot belittle the reviewer or eloquence. But if you complain about the scope of the journal and the influence of the article, it is often unlikely to succeed.

The time depends on the author's specific situation. The usual process is that after the author complains by email, the editor-in-chief will check the manuscript, edit the review comments, and then make a decision. Generally, the editor-in-chief will find someone else to handle your paper. Once the responsible editor is satisfied with your paper after the initial review, your paper will once again enter a new round of review and decision-making process. But it is uncertain whether the final result will be accepted or rejected. If the editor-in-chief sees some highlights in your complaint, he is likely to resubmit it to you.