First, for the vast number of candidates who lack practical experience, this question should not be copied in a large space, and many pits have been set up to lure candidates into it. For example, if candidates don't know the difference between technical renovation subsidies and financial subsidies, they often confuse Hongyuan's environmental protection subsidies with the financial subsidies of cable companies, and equate the two effects completely. After reading the answers from many institutions, all of them are summarized as solving financial difficulties for enterprises without exception. In fact, it is far from the correct answer.

In addition, what is the effect of S municipal government's policy of home visit delivery? Not only is the agency's answer far from each other, but it is obviously a practice of copying materials.

Second, for candidates and institutional teachers who lack relevant work experience in the study and education of party history, there is no concept about which work of J Municipal Taxation Bureau can be included in the long-term mechanism. Take a copy. Instead, I was cheated by the teacher. In fact, there is an obvious point of view on this issue, that is, it can never be included in the long-term mechanism. It is estimated that so far, many institutions have included all the practices of the tax bureau, which is misleading.

Third, the topic of customs service seed enterprises has made a special investigation on how candidates understand the relationship between the stem and the materials. Many candidates are confused by the dazzling measures of the customs, and can't accurately summarize the answers needed for the exam. After reading the answers from many institutions, they are also varied and incoherent, and even can't get to the point.

Fourth, the highlight is the implementation of the Anti-Food Waste Law of G Municipal Market Supervision Administration. Many friends in the public examination not only don't understand the topic, but also know nothing about the measurement standard of law enforcement. Some even wrote a so-called apology letter, but they didn't know why this material didn't need to write an apology letter: 1. The bureau did not go beyond the statutory authority, violate the statutory procedures or go beyond the statutory basis. What is more exaggerated is that the candidates excerpted the remarks of several experts and professors. As we all know, netizens A, B and C plagiarized the most in this question.