1. Blind peer review can reduce the bias and subjective judgment in the process of peer review, and peer reviewers are more likely to focus on the content, methods and results of the paper without knowing the identity of the author, thus improving the quality and accuracy of peer review. This helps to ensure that the evaluation results are more objective and fair.

2. Blind evaluation can prevent plagiarism and academic misconduct. By hiding the author's identity, the paper review process is more rigorous and confidential, and possible academic misconduct is reduced. This helps to maintain academic integrity and protect the reputation of the academic community.