Blind trial system is an academic review system, which aims to ensure the fairness and objectivity of academic papers. However, the blind trial system also has some shortcomings.
First of all, there are some problems in the fairness of the blind trial system. In the process of blind evaluation, the reviewer can't know the identity and background information of the author of the paper, which may lead to the influence of personal prejudice on the evaluation results. For example, if reviewers are biased against experts in a certain field, they may unfairly evaluate papers in that field. In addition, because the reviewers are anonymous, they cannot be responsible for their own evaluation results, which may lead to randomness and inaccuracy of the evaluation results.
Secondly, the blind evaluation system may lead to a decline in the quality of papers. Because the reviewers can't know the identity and background information of the author, they may not be able to fully understand the research background, methods and conclusions of the paper. This may lead to inaccurate and incomplete evaluation of the paper by reviewers, thus affecting the quality and credibility of the paper.
In addition, because reviewers need to complete a large number of papers in a short time, they may not have enough time and energy to read each paper carefully, which may also lead to inaccurate and unfair evaluation results.
Finally, the blind trial system may lead to the reduction of academic cooperation and exchange. Because reviewers can't know the identity and background information of the author, they may not be willing to communicate and cooperate with the author further. This may lead to the reduction of academic cooperation and exchanges, thus affecting the development and progress of academic research.