Briefly introduce what your article is doing, what methods are used to solve what problems, and what results are obtained. It is best to write the results in the abstract with data, such as "XXX reaches 94%".
The introduction includes: background, research status, existing problems of existing methods, existing problems and innovations. Market segments usually include:
Background: briefly introduce what you are doing and what scene you are using. Generally, it doesn't need to occupy a lot of space, and the Chinese small four font should not exceed three lines.
Research Status: First, analyze what technologies you will use in your work, such as technology A, technology B and technology C, and then consult the literature, who studied technology A, what methods were used and what results were obtained. Who has studied Technology B, and what are the methods and achievements? (In the process of description, you should pave the way for your own methods, highlight the shortcomings of others' methods appropriately, but don't be too deliberate, just pave the way for your later articles. )
Problems existing in the existing methods: After analyzing the research status, 2~3 problems are extracted according to the methods of these documents. Clearly and methodically point out the advantages of the existing methods, but what are their disadvantages.
Existing problems (motivation): There are differences between existing problems and existing methods! ! ! Existing problems refer to problems that no one has solved yet, not just the improvement of others' methods. "Problems existing in existing methods" is a subset of "Problems existing at present".
Innovation (contribution): after pointing out the problems existing in the existing methods, I began to write "Propose XXX methods to solve/improve/optimize XXX problems".
Focus! ! ! Judges usually look directly at "motivation" and "contribution", that is, they are very concerned about "why did you do this" and "how did you do it"
Therefore, motivation and contribution are one of the most important parts of writing a paper. In the process of writing motivation and contribution, you must write in sections, and you can't knead it into a ball. take for example
"Although the method used in literature [4-7] is XXX, it has the problem of XXX. The method used in reference [8- 10] got XXX results, but there were XXX problems. In addition, in order to solve the XXX problem, this paper will study and discuss XXX. (Tell me your contribution) The innovations of this article are as follows:
(1) Based on XXX, we can get/optimize/improve XXX by dealing with XXX.
(2)XXXXX”
System architecture is generally divided into two parts, system flow and method.
System process: The system architecture part gives your overall plan from the beginning, and the reviewers will know your overall process at a glance, which will be impressive. Firstly, a flow chart is given, and then the system flow is briefly introduced in several large modules, explaining which part is mainly used for what. Don't be too long, or it will appear verbose.
Methods: the method is to introduce several methods in your paper in turn, which can be divided into subheadings to introduce technology A, technology B and so on. However, it should be noted that we should not copy other people's methods, but should reflect our own improvement. Don't describe too many details in the existing method, just fully reflect your improvement.
The experimental part is the embodiment of the workload and effect of the paper. It should be noted that the experimental design is reasonable and the comparison is sufficient.
Reasonable experimental design: it means that your experiment must be reasonable and well-founded, and the problem you want to solve is verified by your proposed method. You must closely cooperate with the above description, especially echo your research motivation and contribution, otherwise the experiment will not support the innovation of your paper.
Full comparison: Explain that your method needs to be compared with others. The most indispensable thing in this experiment is the comparison of experimental results, which is convincing. When comparing with other people's methods, charts are often used to reflect the results. Tables can reflect workload, and charts can show good results.
The result part is not to repeat the abstraction, but to sort out the whole process, "XXX first, then XXX, then XXX", and finally emphasize what problems have been solved and what effects have been achieved through the XXX method you proposed/improved. It is best to use figures to illustrate the problem. )