antecedent
Evolution, a false belief! Evolution, an ignorant belief! Evolution, a misguided belief!
1859, Darwin proposed the theory of evolution. He believes that life was not created by God, but evolved from simple to complex after a long time. Strictly speaking, evolution is just a hypothesis. Darwin hoped to find conclusive evidence in the future, but so far he has not found any evidence that can stand the test. Moreover, the theory of evolution is too different from the facts, the arguments are ambiguous and the conclusions cannot be repeated. Later scholars inherited the theory of evolution as a scientific belief. It is also because of faith that it is introduced to academia and the public as truth. This novel hypothesis soon formed a popular belief, and people followed suit and regarded it as truth. But rigorous scholars know that a large number of people can't turn a hypothesis into truth, and truth needs rigorous reasoning and irrefutable evidence, which is what evolution lacks.
The author has been keen on the study of evolution for many years and has tried his best to defend his dignity emotionally. But in the face of more and more facts, rigorous thinking made me see the mistakes of evolution. Here, the author hopes to make the problems of evolution and some little-known facts public in popular language. I hope to change 100 years that evolutionists have taken the place of public thinking and even scientists in other fields to understand the truth-everyone has the opportunity to think rationally in the face of facts and rigorous reasoning.
First, the exposed problems are covered up.
From 65438 to 0880, many exquisite stone tools were unearthed at the foot of Mount Tiber in California, USA. After identification, it was confirmed that they were the remains of 55 million years ago, which completely broke the system of human evolution in the theory of evolution. However, this amazing discovery was soon inexplicably "forgotten". When the prevailing theory is impacted, people are always unwilling to doubt their own beliefs, even in the face of facts, they have to doubt or ignore them.
1966, a batch of iron spears were unearthed in Hoyalek, Mexico, and American geologist Dr. Mai Jean Tile was ordered to identify them. She used two methods to date the iron spear and got the same result: 250 thousand years ago. This result, which goes against the theory of evolution, is really unacceptable to the scientific community. A European scholar was forced by various pressures to change into an era that people are willing to accept. However, Professor Mai Gentile, who is well-known internationally, has lost all opportunities to work in related fields.
The late archaeologist Amanta suffered a similar fate. He found a jawbone of a prehistoric animal in Prerava, Mexico, which contained a broken iron spear. The identification found that it was a weapon 260 thousand years ago. Some publications published this unusual discovery, but it soon attracted criticism from the authorities for not doing any investigation, and Amanta's career was stifled.
There are many such stories. It seems that some people are always defending the past and can deny the facts by experience. The authoritative speech of a few people replaced the thinking of the public. The scientific public opinion created by the authorities has become a preconceived thinking framework, and it is difficult for the public to understand the actual situation. Only unconditionally accept the authoritative point of view-science has become a belief here.
With the passage of time, the theory of evolution has exposed more and more problems. Some evolutionists began to fight back. They cautiously questioned the theory of evolution according to the facts, and naturally attracted empirical criticism without exception. However, facts are facts after all, and theoretical confusion always attracts everyone who seeks truth.
Second, the three evidences of evolution have been shattered one after another.
There are three classical evidences of evolution: comparative anatomy, paleontology and the law of embryo development, but they have been disintegrated in recent years.
Comparative anatomy reveals the logical error of evolution-circular argument.
Scientifically speaking, if the proof of a theory violates logic, then the theory cannot be established, but people have not corrected the logical mistakes of evolution in depth, and because they have been corrected in depth, there is no evidence at all. For example, using comparative anatomy to demonstrate evolution, it is vividly said: "If people evolved from apes, people and apes will have many similar characteristics;" Because there are many similarities between humans and apes, humans evolved from apes. "Anyone who understands logic knows that this circular argument is meaningless. This specious "proof" runs through all the evidence of evolution. People follow suit and blindly accept it.
The law of embryo development recurrence cannot be based on logic, and it can't stand scrutiny in theory. It's actually an observation error.
/kloc-in the 9th century, haeckel, a German, put forward the theory of recursion law, arguing that the embryonic development of higher organisms would reproduce the evolutionary process of this species. In fact, the law of repetition itself is a hypothesis, which has become an important evidence of evolution: if evolution exists, the "repetition phenomenon" of embryonic development seems to reflect the process of evolution; Evolution exists because of cycles. This not only uses meaningless circular argument, but also conceals the most crucial point: no one understands the relationship between "reappearance phenomenon" and evolution, and insists that it is causal.
In fact, the law of recursion is a hypothesis put forward when biology is still underdeveloped. With the emergence of genetics and the development of molecular biology, especially the deepening of genetic research, recursive theory has lost its theoretical basis. Since the past genes have mutated into new genes, how can we reproduce the characteristics of the past? As for the recursive law itself, paleontologist Gould also pointed out the fatal flaw of the theory, which has been recognized.
Now, many scholars have proved that the law of repetition is an observation error. In the book "The Origin of Human Life" written by German human embryologist Erich Blechschmidt, it is proved with detailed data that the human fetus is the structure of all mankind from the beginning. For example, it is considered that the "branchial fissure" in the early stage of the fetus is actually a wrinkle in the fetal face, which is completely the structure of the human face and is called "branchial fissure". The fetus is about 9 mm, and the lower end of the body protrudes like a tail. In fact, it doesn't have any structural features of the tail. It is a hollow neural tube that develops rapidly and grows in the direction of low resistance. It stood out for a while and soon calmed down. And it plays an important role. It is not a residual organ at all.
For rare deformities: hairy children and children with long tails, evolution believes that they are the characteristics of human ancestors; According to this reasoning, if there are many anencephaly, then that person's ancestors have no brains? Congenital limb deformities and long fingers and toes are also common, so human limbs evolved from various deformities? If we think outside the framework of evolution, we will find that the so-called "atavism" is just a deformity or defect, a reflection of gene distortion, and it is meaningless to be associated with human ancestors.
In paleontology, no conclusive evidence-transitional types in evolution has been found so far. If evolution exists, there must be transitional types between species in the process of evolution, otherwise evolution is fallacy.
Logically, transitional fossils have become one of the three major evidences of evolution. In fact, there is no conclusive evidence in this regard. Darwin and others speculated that clear evidence would be found in the 20th century, that is, "conjecture" was used as evidence at that time-this is extremely serious. What is the truth? There are countless fossils unearthed so far, and no evidence can stand scrutiny and identification.
On the issue from apes to humans, finding the transitional species "apes" has long been included in the "top ten unsolved cases" of science. The ancestors of mankind, announced several times, were quickly denied. For example, in 1892, the transitional fossil "Garber Man" between man and ape was pieced together by the skull of an ape and the leg bones of a man 40 feet apart. Academics denied the "Garber", but it was still publicized in science and education circles. It was not until 1984 that "Garber Man" was replaced by the newly discovered ape-man fossil "Lucy". But in the later appraisal, Lucy was also denied by most scholars. Scientists have determined that Lucy is an extinct ape, which has nothing to do with people. Six "archaeopteryx fossils" came out one after another, causing a sensation in the world and becoming a model of transitional species between birds and reptiles. Later, five were identified as artificial, and the remaining 1 resolutely refused any identification. The original "discoverer" admitted that one of the reasons for the fraud was that he believed in evolution too much and produced the most powerful evidence. Archaeopteryx and Lucy in the textbook have not been corrected, and the public will not know the truth.
If evolution exists, transitional fossils should be easy to find. Why not? Everyone follows Darwin's explanation: the fossil record is incomplete. Deep thinking: the formation of fossils is universal and random. Why do we just miss the transition type? Philip johnson, the author of Darwin's Trial, summed it up like this: "Fossils show us some creatures that suddenly appear without any trace of gradual evolution ... Once these creatures appear, no matter how the climate and environment change, they will basically not change, even after millions of years. If Darwin's theory holds, these conditions should cause great changes in species. "
Paleontologists Stephen Jay Gould and eldridge once put forward a "punctuated equilibrium" hypothesis based on the facts of geological history, to show that the probability of transitional types forming fossils is very small, but it cannot explain why transitional types do not exist at all, and the evolutionary mechanism of this hypothesis is absolutely impossible at the genetic level.
Third, the fatal mistake of modern evolution.
If a theory is correct, then its truth can be proved from different angles, and different proofs complement each other. The proof of relativity and the proof that genes are DNA molecules are exactly the same. Evolution, on the other hand, is the opposite: there are fundamental opposites among various theories and the differences are unique.
Perhaps Gould's example can vividly reveal the reason: "brinton pointed out in the study of 1890 that blacks are inferior because they retain the characteristics of childhood;" L. Bolk's research in 1926 claims that blacks are inferior because their development has surpassed the childhood characteristics reserved by whites. "Why do contradictory arguments support the same point of view? Because they are looking for a basis for a wrong belief, rather than drawing scientific conclusions based on facts. What is exposed here is also the problem of evolution.
From a general point of view, if a theory is fundamentally contradictory and contradicts some proven theorems, then scientific rigor cannot tolerate its foothold. The following fatal questions are enough to deny the theory of evolution:
Probability calculation shows that the possibility of biological evolution is very small and absolutely impossible. Modern evolutionism explains evolution from the genetic level, which was unimaginable in Darwin's time. There is no fundamental change in genes, and all superficial changes are meaningless to evolution. In other words, evolution must be based on gene evolution. Modern evolutionism explains the fundamental reason of evolution with the hypothesis of random mutation of genes. It is worth noting that today, when mathematical formulas and models are widely used in the field of biology, evolutionists have never put forward a formula to calculate the probability of gene mutation mechanism realizing evolution, because any reasonable formula will deny evolution.
Many scholars have proved the mistakes of modern evolution with probability. The book Darwin's Black Box by M.J. Behr denies the possibility of evolution in many places based on the complexity and accuracy of life structure.
In this paper, a loose formula is proposed to calculate the probability of new species produced by evolution according to the mutation probability: p = (m? c？ l？ b？ S) amp& amp & ordinary
In layman's terms, it means that the individual of a species has a mutation (the probability is only10&; &-3), and the mutant gene is compatible with other genes in different grades of products (roughly estimated as10&; &-2), and in the competition for survival, individuals can survive and have the opportunity to reproduce (10&; &-1), and mutation just means vertical evolution (so far, this situation has not been found, and the weight estimation is10&; &-3), and the mutant gene will not be lost, stable or expanded in the population, and once lost, it will start again (the loose estimate is10&; & amp-2); Because the formation of new species requires the emergence of a series of new genes, assuming that there is 10 (power exponent n = 10, there is absolutely no such small genetic difference between actual species), then the probability of evolving new species is: p = (10&; & amp3× 10 & amp； & amp2× 10 & amp； & amp- 1 × 10。 & amp-3× 10 & amp； & amp-2)& amp； & amp 10 = 10。 & amp- 1 10。
According to the annual breeding 10 generation, the number of individuals in the population is 1000, and the corresponding evolutionary time is extremely loose, so the calculation also needs10&&; 106. At present, science thinks that the total number of all elementary particles in the universe is only10&; & amp70, and the age of the universe is only 20 billion (2×10&; & kloc-0/0 years), the time to evolve a new species is the age of the universe times 10 billion times, so evolution is absolutely impossible.
Numerous practices have proved that the change of varieties and the emergence of new species are two different things. Darwin extended the changes within a species to the evolution of all living species. For example, dogs can breed many kinds, so monkeys can also evolve into adults. This speculation itself is very problematic. The result of practice is denying Darwin's conjecture. Breeding experts know that the range of change of a species is limited. The finally bred varieties are either sterile or become the original parents again.
In modern evolutionism, the speed of evolution is contradictory between theory and fact. From low to high, vertically, on the whole, the speed of gene mutation is getting slower and slower, the natural viability of mutant individuals is getting lower and lower, and the evolution speed should be getting slower and slower; In the field of evolution, it is recognized that in geological history, vertically, new creatures appear faster and faster, showing an obvious trend of accelerating evolution.
The "evolutionary timetable" covers a large number of negative examples, and fossils show the history of periodic disasters. The timetable of biological evolution was compiled to prove the theory of evolution under the condition of limited fossil data, and there are many mistakes in itself. For example, the appearance time of birds is based on the false archaeopteryx. With more and more fossils unearthed later, a large number of cases against the theory of evolution appeared constantly, but these findings were suppressed because they were incomprehensible. If all the discoveries of paleontology are arranged in chronological order, the results obtained are enough to deny the theory of evolution. Archaeologists Kramer and Thomson (Michael A. Cremeaux &; Richard Thompson's Taboo Archaeology lists 500 concrete examples that are contrary to the theory of evolution. These examples are the remains of human civilization tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions, tens of thousands or even hundreds of millions of years ago.
Archaeologist Y. Druet discovered some different types of metal pipes in a limestone layer in France, which has been 65 million years. 12 human footprints were found next to dinosaur footprints in rocks along the lakeside river in Texas, USA. Human finger fossils and a hammer were found in the same stratum, and the handle of the hammer has turned into coal, which shows its age. The hammer contains 96.6% iron, 0.74% sulfur and 2.6% chlorine, which is an alloy that cannot be made now. Hundreds of exquisite metal balls dating back to 2.8 billion years ago, and large nuclear reactors 2 billion years ago, their structures are also more advanced than today. Many scholars speculate that the reactor is the remains of aliens, so the ancient temple 20 thousand years ago is obviously the building of the earth, and its astronomical knowledge and metallurgical technology are beyond the reach of modern people; The discovery of iron weapons 250,000 years ago shows the underdevelopment of human civilization. 1998 (volume 282 1453 ~ 1459) A series of archaeological discoveries were published in famous American scientific magazines: 15000 years ago, 23000 years ago, 30000 years ago, horses carved with mammoth ivory, 90000. We know that it took only about 5,000 years for our human civilization to develop from ignorance to today's glory. Don't these monuments represent civilizations in different periods? There are countless examples of this.
Facts tell people that human civilization also follows such a law: "Birth-development-extinction". If we jump out of the box of evolution, we will find that fossils actually hit back at evolution. Fossils cannot be formed under normal circumstances. Before decaying and weathering, living things must be buried deep underground, and they can gradually become fossils under strong pressure. Only cataclysm can provide such conditions, and fossils have become the witness of disasters. The study of fossils in strata only tells people that the development of species suddenly appears in a large area in a short period of time, develops and prospers, and then destroys, and the remaining and emerging species develop repeatedly.
There are many direct evidences of periodic disasters on the earth. The remains of thousands of frozen mammals have been found in the permafrost in Sibelli. Some are intact, and some are torn and twisted with the trunk. The food in their stomachs was detected, and Ranunculus ternatus was found before it could be digested. Living facts tell people that it used to be a temperate grassland, and this devastating disaster happened in a very short time. According to Hapgood, in a short time, the plate moved thousands of miles, which brought the Sibelli pressure to its present position. Of course, it may also be the cause of other disasters. According to historical data, Professor Hapgood discovered the world map drawn by Oronteus Finaeus in 1532, which shows Antarctica under the ice. When it is superimposed with the characteristics of Antarctic ice measured in modern times, it is strikingly similar. 15 13 piri was also found in Constantinople. The coastal maps of Africa and South America and the map of Antarctica drawn by A. PiriReis according to historical data are accurate to half a longitude, which is 250 years earlier than humans can determine their position at sea. Obviously, this is the relic of the last period of human civilization. Besides, during that civilization, Antarctica was not covered with ice and snow.
Fourth, mankind has forgotten the past.
At this point, who wants to maintain the belief in evolution? In fact, many rational scientists now admit that evolution is an unprovable belief, and there is no new theory, so we can only use it, and if we oppose it, we will be ruined. There are many such examples. Many scientists have struggled for the theory of evolution for decades, and the more they study it, the more they feel that the theory of evolution is ethereal. Some people, like Newton and Einstein, finally woke up and went to religion to find the answer. Michael Denton, a New Zealand geneticist, said frankly in his book Emergence Theory: Evolution Theory: "Darwin's theory of evolution is the biggest lie in the 20th century."
In the introduction of the original meaning of Bhagavad-gita, a great spiritual master of the late Indian generation, Saint Prabhupada wrote: "mortals have four defects: (1) are bound to make mistakes; (2) often confused by illusions; (3) there is a tendency to cheat; (4) Limited by incomplete senses. People with these four defects cannot fully convey all the knowledge that exists everywhere. " The initiator of evolution and his followers are the best portrayal of these four defects.
Evolution misleads not only the whole biology, but also many fields such as psychology, ethics and philosophy, and the development of human civilization. Its potential harm to human civilization is shocking: it makes people regard the good and evil of religion and morality as deception and destroys spiritual sustenance and moral restraint; It tells people that the law of the jungle, the survival of the fittest, take various means to develop themselves in the competition; People believe that anti-traditional and anti-trend distortions may have more evolutionary and better results; It makes people believe that people are descendants of animals and human nature comes from animals; The further development of western psychology holds that human desire is the most essential nature of human beings, even the best nature evolved, which scientifically removes the constraints on the cross-flow of material desires and moral corruption. This kind of propaganda permeates all aspects of society. All these corrupt factors have permeated everything in modern ordinary society, which has potentially promoted the decline of human morality. People are bent on evolving themselves, developing themselves indulgently, surviving in fierce competition and anxiety, and becoming more and more selfish. When selfish desires are not satisfied, all kinds of immoral behaviors and crimes will intensify. People have lost their understanding and trust and their sense of security in society. The brief enjoyment and glory are all irretrievable things: moral decline, psychological distortion, lust expansion, polarization, strange diseases, endless competition, abnormal social development, resource depletion, environmental pollution, tragic war and so on. Without moral restraint, people will lose control, develop their own selfish desires and lead to irreparable things. I'm afraid it's time to get rid of the superstition of evolution.
We should face up to the real history covered by evolution. Countless brilliant civilizations have disappeared, and only sporadic remnants can be seen. In our memory, we only remember the legend left by Plato's time: the developed Atlantis civilization was buried at the bottom of the sea. The prehistoric human civilization visible so far, the Egyptian pyramids, the ancient city of Tiavalacu in Bolivia and the Huaman Castle in Sachse in Peru may be outstanding representatives. These megalithic buildings embody a civilization, and their astronomy, architecture, metallurgy and other technologies have surpassed those of modern people. Why are the distant legends they left behind, as well as legends around the world, surprisingly consistent in the reasons for the destruction of civilization? Today's people forget the enlightenment of the ancients, and even pretend to be ignorant with the theory of evolution.
The giant statue on Easter Island gazes at the east quietly. At that time, people did not forget to carve tears on the statue.