The feeling after reading belongs to the category of argumentative writing, but it is different from the general argumentative writing.
General argumentative essays require clear viewpoints, typical arguments and rigorous argumentation; The most prominent feature of post-reading feeling is the close combination of "reading" and "feeling". "reading" refers to who and what you read, what happened in the text and what you think; "Feeling" means how you feel after reading it. Reading is the basis of feeling, and feeling is the sublimation of reading. As far as the works read are concerned, "reading" means "namely"-making necessary explanations on the contents and sensitive points read; "Feeling" means "separation"-associating and talking about feelings according to their origins. "Sense" is the interaction between "reading" and is inseparable.
The combination of "reading" and "feeling" generally takes two forms: one is to feel while reading (explaining what you have read); The second is to describe the feelings after reading. In principle, it is easier to grasp the form of reading first and then feeling, which is suitable for beginners to write after feeling.
To write a good summary, in addition to mastering the above basic stylistic knowledge, you must also master the following writing steps:
First, study the original text. Only by studying the original text well can we have a profound and comprehensive understanding and grasp of the content and theme of the original text and get some insights from it, which is the basis for writing a good feeling after reading.
Second, establish a starting point. The starting point is the central argument of post-reading, and it is also the "starting point" of the article.
An article, a book, a movie, a drama, the content is simple and complicated, there are many clues, the characters have their own themes, and their opinions are deep and shallow. After reading it, it is impossible to cover everything. So, how to establish the starting point? The method is simple. After studying a certain work, we are bound to be inspired and have some feelings, and the point (or points) that we are most inspired and deeply touched can be established as the "perception point". For example, in a people-centered narrative, emotional points are often the most prominent features of a character's spirit, thoughts, personality or the most valuable remarks and actions. In narrative writing, the starting point is often the meaning contained in the event, a problem or a universal law reflected. The starting point of an argumentative essay is generally the central argument or sub-argument of the argumentative essay read. The establishment of other stylistic points is similar to this, so I won't go into details one by one.
Third, reading comprehension.
Narrative reading refers to the explanation of the source, title, author, feeling point and other aspects of the article read, in order to let readers understand the source of this feeling and what they feel after reading. These explanations are essential, otherwise, readers will not understand where your "feeling" comes from. Feeling is the main part of the article, which is based on reading and feeling, expanding association and extension, and connecting with reality.
The principle of association and extension is to focus on the feeling point, which is closely related to the original material. It is necessary to analyze, discuss or express feelings about the content and reality of the connection, so that the "feeling" will be profound. This is also the most important way to expand the main part of the post-reading feeling.
In addition, in the process of demonstrating the origin, we should pay attention to closely combining two kinds of arguments, one is the original material we read, and the other is the material of association and extension.
Fourth, the review is over. The end can summarize the center, summarize the full text, ask questions, express opinions and make people think. "Writing has no definite method", the content determines the form, and the form in which it ends depends on the type of reading experience.
Fifth, write common questions after reading.
1, read the original text more, without "feeling" or "feeling" less, and pretend to be the master. Some students write what they think after reading, and the main part is to completely repeat the plot of the original text, or add a few anodyne comments. These all violate the most basic requirements of post-reading.
2, comment on the original text, without "feeling", far-fetched. This kind of article confuses the boundary between post-reading and literary criticism, and reluctantly binds irrelevant content together. It is also the most common problem of some students.
3, empty and abstract, lack of association, no fascinating fresh ideas. The main part of this kind of article often can't be opened, mainly because there is no idea.
4, a little water, everything, no focus. The main crux of this kind of article lies in not grasping the spirit or theme of the original text and not establishing the main points of good feelings.
These are just the four most common problems, and there may be more than these in writing practice.
The feeling after reading is an important form of composition. As long as students read more books, think more, practice more, and constantly sum up their own writing experience, they will certainly be able to write a good review.