Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - How to quickly determine three sub-arguments in writing argumentative essays?
How to quickly determine three sub-arguments in writing argumentative essays?
1. Argument: It is the soul and commander-in-chief of an article. Any article has only one central argument, and usually there can be sub-arguments.

Arguments should be clear, accurate and general, and never be ambiguous or unpredictable. There are generally four kinds of positions in the debate:

(1) the title such as "transform our study" and "against stereotyped Party writing"

(2) Opening remarks such as "changing our learning style"

(3) Intermediate articles, such as "Taking Doctrine" and "On Accumulation and Storage"

(4) At the end, such as "On Qin", "Benevolence is not applied, and the offensive and defensive trends are different."

2. Arguments The materials used to prove arguments include factual arguments and theoretical arguments. Facts speak with facts, and theoretical arguments win with classics. The argument must revolve around the central argument, which is the most basic requirement. If the selected examples are inconsistent with the arguments, it will inevitably weaken the persuasiveness. For example, if memory can be transplanted in the composition of 1999 college entrance examination, we must make clear the difference between "memory" and "memory" when writing argumentative essays. Some candidates obviously made the mistake of deviating from the argument, citing Guo Moruo's Dream of Red Mansions as an example, which greatly reduced their persuasiveness.

When choosing factual arguments, there are several points to pay attention to:

Parameters must be typical.

Typical means that the argument should be representative.

(2) The argument must be novel. Many students' argumentative writing is inseparable from some old examples. For example, writing about the relationship between failure and success seems to be inseparable from Edison's invention of the light bulb. To write about adversity, you have to write about Zhang Haidi. Similar content does not mean that you can't use it, but that you use it, others use it, and everyone uses it. Whose composition is different?

(3) The statement of the argument should be concise, which is different from the narrative. It only needs to express the content related to the argument.

3. Argumentative writing is an important part of argumentative writing, which contains a lot of content.

① Basic types of argumentation: argumentation and refutation. Argument is discussed from the front, and rebuttal is discussed from the opposite side. We usually write argumentative essays mainly based on arguments.

② The basic structural level of argument: syllogism structure.

Put forward the problem (what is it) → analyze the problem (why) → solve the problem (how to do it)

Namely: introduce the conclusion of this theory.

General parameter structure:

A, summation structure b, control structure c, progressive structure d and parallel structure

The flexible use of the multi-level argumentation structure between paragraphs and sentences in the article will make the argumentative paper more active.