The beginning and the end, plus the middle part.

For example, a narrative, a string of beads, is parallel in the middle. The author has written relevant papers, and here is a quote.

Application of single-line beading

Some articles, written on seemingly irrelevant topics, feel natural and coherent when read. This is mainly because the author is good at choosing the thing that best reflects its internal relationship among many themes as the clue to sort out the materials, otherwise it will be scattered.

Ba Jin's prose "Stars" narrates such a fragment: In a collection of Belgian short stories, I came across such a sentence: "Stars, beautiful stars, you are rolling in boundless space, and this is the same. I know you … yes, I know you … I am a person … a person who can feel … a painful person … stars, beautiful. Many people have talked to the stars in the blue sky in this way. They are all unfortunate people in the world. The stars always give them great comfort. On a small stage in Shanghai, I saw Turgenev written by German musician Meng. He either sits in front of the piano, pinning his noblest feelings on music and presenting them to a person; Or standing under the blue sky, shaking his white-haired head and admiringly saying, "You beautiful star, you pure star." Seeing countless stars flashing in the blue sky like primary school students, his eyes were moist. I know the old musician's tears. This should be the spring rain that irrigates the soul. Outside my room, there is a blue sky that is not covered by roof tiles. I looked up and saw some stars embedded in the sky. I often stare at those beautiful stars with ecstasy. They are like a person's eyes, looking at me affectionately and never getting tired. These eyes are moving all the time, as if giving me a blessing.

The stars will not fall in my sky. My eyes are moist at the thought of this.

Three things are written here: the complaints of the station staff in Belgian short stories, the admiration for German musician Lao Lun Meng in Turgenev's works, and the ideological activities of "I" in the room. These three things are neither related in time nor place, but they don't make people feel sloppy and messy in an article. This is because although these three things have nothing to do, they are all related to "stars" and the comfort that stars give people. "Star" is like a line, connecting three unrelated things. If there is no "star" clue to connect, what the author wants to describe is like a broken pearl. Not everything can be used as a narrative clue, only those specific things that can reflect the internal relationship between various materials and the theme of the article can be used as clues throughout the whole article. For example, the three things described in the above short passage, although not related to each other, all show the same idea: seeking comfort in pain and seeing hope in the dark. And "star" can well reflect this internal connection and theme, because among these three things, "star" is endowed with the same symbolic meaning, that is, it symbolizes comfort in pain and hope in the dark.

Argumentative writing can also be like this.

In the middle, either parallel, progressive or comparative.

According to the experience of writing in senior three in recent years, the best way is to use comparison, positive and negative examples and a quotation.

You can search for excellent compositions on the Internet, and then according to the above analysis, you can get the three-stage writing method of college entrance examination composition.

The following is not a college entrance examination article, but it can illustrate a problem: as long as you see comparisons and quotations in the article, you are half successful.

Affordable winner

"Zero-sum game" is a form of game theory, and its basic rule is that there are only two situations in any case: winning or losing. This means that the two sides will always be antagonistic, and the increase of one side's interests will inevitably mean the decrease of the other side's interests. This is a strong "law of the jungle".

In today's era, the competition for limited resources is becoming increasingly fierce, and competition and struggle have become people's yearning and accustomed living conditions. All kinds of successful cases in the market have declared a resounding oath: I want to be a winner in life. But is this really what we want?

Maybe not always. The desire to "win" is full of upward motivation, but what I am worried about is whether the utilitarian mentality of radical change and progress will make the real ideal go away, degrade the harmonious environment and make the quiet and peaceful life noisy.

Maybe sometimes, we need a culture of "losing".

Anyone who wants to win must not afford to lose. Life is called "affordable"? It doesn't mean that you can't afford to lose. At most, it is only the result of actively resisting loss in behavior. "Can't afford to lose" is to admit defeat from the heart and dare to admit defeat. It takes a lot of wisdom to admit frankly that you are inferior to others and that you are small and powerless. As a veteran with many honors, the "Queen" of the Russian pole vault made frequent mistakes in the Olympic Games and eventually lost the election, but she smiled so calmly in front of the audience and the media, as if to say regretfully, "Well, maybe I am old." Ba Jin, a master of literature, held a pen all his life, but said in his later years that he was not a "writer". This is not an emotional modesty, but a frank self-evaluation after understanding the principles of literature. People who will "lose" understand that there is a world behind them, so they know fear; People who will "lose" understand the inevitability of progress, so they know how to appreciate it. Confucius was a great sage, but he admitted that he was inferior to his disciples in many aspects, and said, "Where there is a threesome, there must be a teacher." Only by lowering yourself can you learn better. It is shameful for American President cathleen to fail in the election, but he sincerely congratulates his successor and devotes himself to social affairs for the rest of his life, because he knows that whoever wins or loses in the election is for the prosperity of the country. It can be seen that people who can't afford to lose are calmer, more generous, more sincere and wiser. In their view, life is not an offensive process, but a progressive process. Winning or losing is not the most important thing, what is important is harvesting, learning and self-adaptation.

Any society that wants to win should respect the value of losing. In a society, values should be diversified. We encourage healthy competition and tolerate glorious failure. We worship the strong and respect the weak. Only such a society can be conducive to innovation and be more humane.

Those who can't afford to lose are the real winners!

Score: 23+24+ 10=57 points.

Comments: This article is very dialectical and convincing. The article begins with zero-sum game theory, which leads to the topics of "losing" and "winning", which is novel and interesting. The main paragraph revolves around "losing": what is affordable, why should I buy it, who can afford it, and what will happen if I can afford it. The argument is sufficient, the thinking is clear, the case is typical and the logic is rigorous, so the content is divided into 23 points.

This article is fluent in language, full of momentum and neat in writing. I express 24 points.

The title of this article is viewpoint. The author skillfully unifies the antonyms of "losing" and "winning" in the title, indicating that being a winner is the purpose, the goal and the ideal, and losing is the attitude, the spirit and the mind. The thought is profound, so the development level is 10.