Argumentative structure template
0 1
How to write the title:
The title must reflect the genre of the article and must not be similar to prose or narrative.
Generally speaking, there are two ways to ask questions:
First, indicate the scope of the article.
For example, about friendship, about ideals, about courage and so on.
Second, the topic is argumentation.
This kind of writing is very special and eye-catching. In most cases, the effect is very good. Reading the following content will make the reviewers have a sense of the overall situation closely related to the topic, such as "unity is strength" and "emphasizing reason over literature"
02
The first paragraph at the beginning leads to the topic:
If it is a discussion material, the paragraph must compress the material to about 50%, so as to remind the examiner that the candidate has the language ability to summarize the material. If it is a topic composition, you can casually talk about some phenomena or facts related to the following arguments, not exceeding 80 words. At the end of this paragraph, you can use a question (argument as the answer) to lead to the next argument.
03
The second paragraph is the demonstration paragraph. The argument only needs one sentence (the shorter the better), and it must be an exclusive paragraph!
Years of experience tell me that any composition that tries to make examiners rack their brains to find arguments, or even let them sum up arguments in full swing, will not have any good results. If they pass, they will be lucky.
The argument would rather not be novel than controversial, and the position should not be wrong, otherwise it will become a zero-point composition.
04
The third to fifth paragraphs are arguments. 150 to 200 words per paragraph.
The first sentence of each of these three paragraphs is a sub-argument, and there can be two relationships between these three sub-arguments: one is a parallel relationship, such as an article about respecting the elderly and loving the young, and the sub-arguments can be:
1) China has a fine tradition of respecting the elderly and caring for the young since ancient times.
2) Today's society still advocates respecting the old and loving the young.
3) All countries in the world regard respecting the old and caring for the young as moral principles.
05
The sixth paragraph should be linked with the reality of life. (About 80 words)
This paragraph can point out the guiding significance of the argument in reality, and can also be linked with current events, giving people a feeling of broadening their horizons and caring about state affairs. For example, confidence. This paragraph can be written about the significance of self-confidence in our real life study and communication, and can also be related to the successful launch of Shenzhou. It is precisely because our Chinese nation is full of self-confidence that we have made such great achievements in the development of human science and technology.
06
The seventh paragraph is the so-called dialectical paragraph. (About 50 words)
This paragraph is mainly to show that candidates have the ability of dialectical thinking, not too much, just a few crosses, to prevent loopholes after the argument is extreme. For example, if the argument is "one must learn to be confident", then some people may think that conceit is also confidence. Therefore, it must be pointed out in this paragraph that we must be confident, but never confuse self-confidence with conceit. In this way, the article appears compact and leaves a good impression on the reviewers.
07
The eighth and last paragraph must reiterate the argument, and try to be brief, avoid verbosity, avoid preaching and avoid slogans.
For example, respecting the old and loving the young, starting with me. (concise and clear)
Three elements of argumentative writing
0 1
quarrel
It is the author's views and opinions on the issues discussed.
1. Distinguish topics from arguments.
2. Pay attention to the position of the argument: head and tail, and summarize it yourself.
3. Pay attention to the expression form of the argument: you can control the full text, express positive or negative judgments, and make clear statements.
02
quarrel
Is the material to prove the argument.
1. factual arguments: including representative and conclusive cases, historical facts and statistical data.
When clarifying the argument, we should pay special attention to the summarized facts.
2. Reasoning and argumentation: refer to incisive theories, famous sayings and aphorisms, folk proverbs and recognized facts that have been tested by practice.
03
set an example
It is the process of proving an argument with rigorous arguments.
The purpose of argumentation is to reveal the internal logical relationship between arguments and arguments; Argumentative essays are generally divided into argumentation and refutation: argumentation is a kind of argumentation method to explain the author's views and opinions from the front of an event or problem; Refutation is a way of argument to refute others' wrong arguments with powerful arguments. There are generally three methods: refuting arguments, refuting arguments and refuting arguments.
Argumentative argumentation method
0 1
model
Example method, also called case argumentation method, is a method to prove the correctness of one's argument with convincing typical cases. It is the most commonly used argumentation method in argumentative writing. "Facts speak louder than words" is self-evident in the face of typical cases.
02
Introduction method
The frequency of quotation in examination room or writing practice is second only to that of examples. Because citation refers to the crystallization of thought recognized by the world, it can profoundly reflect the essence of things and is proved by countless facts, so it is very convincing.
03
Speak in simile
Metaphor is a method to demonstrate an argument with metaphor.
In argumentative writing, metaphor can make the argument easier to understand, more interesting and more easily recognized. Metaphor can turn abstraction into concreteness, difficulty into simplicity and boredom into vividness.
Argumentative writing skills
0 1
Refine key points and cultivate the accuracy of test questions
When examining questions, teachers should consciously guide students through the complicated part of the questions, find out the key points and understand the meaning of the questions. Therefore, when reviewing the questions, students should pay special attention to the key words in the questions. The so-called keywords are the mathematical knowledge, specific data and known conditions involved in the topic. Ignoring them often makes the problem-solving process blind and the thinking in trouble.
02
A profound and creative point of view
If an argumentative paper wants to be thought-provoking and thought-provoking, it must have profound and creative views. Profound and creative here refers not only to what others have not said, but also to the views summarized from common things, phenomena or problems. This view can make people feel bright after reading it.
03
The language is accurate and vivid
Argumentative writing does not need to speak with a straight face, so the language should be as lively as possible; At the same time, argumentative writing should not talk indiscriminately, so the language should be accurate. For example, the last paragraph of the article: "Let's build a bright future together, and let's look forward to the sunrise tomorrow. I hope it doesn't matter, it doesn't matter. Just like the road on the ground. In fact, there is no road on the ground. Only by standing up and working hard can we find our own way. " This passage imitates Lu Xun's article and accurately summarizes the main idea of this article. The language is vivid, infectious and worth learning.
04
Pay attention to the transition between layers.
In order to make the discussion thorough, we must pay attention to the hierarchy of reasoning when writing argumentative essays. In reasoning, the relationship between levels is mainly parallel and progressive, and the transition between levels with parallel relationship is generally connected by related words such as "simultaneous" and "still". Transitions between levels with progressive relations are often connected by words such as "not only that, but also", "further" and "of course". Source network.