First, use the guide correctly. When submitting a paper, if the cited content wants to pass the duplicate checking software, it is necessary to use the guide correctly. Only the correct citation format is correct in the paper.

If the article is not instructive, but duplicates the contents in the database, it is likely to be judged as plagiarism. Therefore, we must pay attention to the use of quotation marks when quoting the contents of the paper. In addition, if only half of the quotation marks are used, the duplicate checking software can't be anything else, so the quotation marks should be used comprehensively, otherwise the quoted content will be regarded as plagiarism.

Second, is it a quotation? When some quoted contents are marked as plagiarism, it is necessary to check whether the document is included in the duplicate checking system. If this article is not included in the paper detection system, the cited knowledge is not very authoritative and is likely to be judged as plagiarism. Therefore, when quoting the content, it is necessary to ensure that the paper is also included in the document library of the detection system.

Third, the citation ratio is too large. Many people will quote many articles in order to avoid being found by duplicate checking software. In fact, this method is not desirable. Many duplicate checking softwares have taken this into account in their design. If the quotation ratio is too large, it will also be regarded as plagiarism. So when writing a paper, I suggest that you don't quote too much, because it will be considered as plagiarism.

Extended data:

At present, HowNet mainly checks the format of word. If students submit pdf or other formats, the recognition rate of HowNet will be lower. Therefore, the author suggests that before submitting the paper to HowNet for duplicate check,

You can check what kind of duplicate checking system HowNet is used in your school first, and then go to the third-party paper testing platform to check the duplicate checking of HowNet in advance, and make it clear whether the footnotes you marked can be identified as quotation parts.

Finally, it goes without saying that the position of footnotes is also very important. If a footnote is added to the symbol, the probability of being identified as a quoted part will be greatly improved, which can basically reach more than 90%. I hope these suggestions can help the author of the paper and greatly reduce the repetition rate of removing cited documents.