Innovation is not the so-called behind closed doors, nor is it made up by one's own subjective imagination. Instead, we should pay attention to the results of practice, and innovation will be more meaningful under the guidance of others' correct theories. /kloc-Newton, a great British scientist in the 0 th and 7 th centuries, discovered the law of gravity and the three laws of motion. Innovation is not without richness. But when someone asked him why he achieved such success, he said, "If I see farther, it is because I stand on the shoulders of giants." Although this is only a temporary modesty, if you think about it carefully, if Galileo didn't look up at the starry sky at night, Tycho would have studied the laws of celestial motion for decades, and it seems that Newton would have to struggle to sum up the three laws of object motion. It can be seen that practice and innovation are inseparable, and innovation is only desirable in the practice of taking its essence and discarding its dross.
As a revolutionary mentor of the world proletariat, Marx devoted his life to writing a brilliant masterpiece "Das Kapital". His innovative spirit inspired and brought up a large number of people with lofty ideals to fight for social progress. It is true that a table and a chair in the British Museum witnessed his sudden enlightenment after meditation, and the subsequent words witnessed his unprecedented theory. But if he didn't concentrate on reading predecessors' works and abstract materials, Saint-Simon's and Fourier's Utopia theory, he wouldn't have succeeded. It can even be asserted that without them, Das Kapital might not have been completed so quickly, and we might have to grope our way forward in the dark. It can be seen that innovation often gets twice the result with half the effort in inheritance. In fact, Deng Xiaoping Theory and Theory of Three Represents, who led us to prosperity, eloquently expounded the relationship between practice and innovation.
Blind innovation is often self-defeating and makes people laugh. Don't you know that Zheng Guoren, a toddler in Handan, always wants to learn other people's footwork so that he can walk differently from his native? It seems to be innovative, but his motives are not pure, his methods are wrong, he doesn't know how to inherit, and he finally climbs back. A few years ago, the essay "So Packaged" also said this truth. Originally, Pingju was an art worthy of inheritance, but the "director" insisted on "innovation" and forced pop music to be compatible with national art. The result can be imagined. We have been talking about the "four unlike" from "innovation" for many years. It's easy to make the same mistake if you don't get to the point.
Practice and innovation are the relationship between rain and water. Without practice, it is like a fish without water. No matter how good the innovation is, it will become a castle in the air and will not have long-term vitality. And only water without fish seems to show the dead silence and lifelessness of only practice without innovation. Only when fish and water are combined can they become alive. Just as the perfect combination of innovation and practice will bear the fruit of success.
Innovation is important, but practice is equally important. If you want to succeed, practice and innovation are essential. "Ask the canal to be so clear, because there is running water at the source." No practice is passive water, and no innovation is stagnant water. Only by innovating on the basis of practice can we be truly "clear".