To evaluate graduation design, we should adhere to quality standards, study the writing of comments, and make the evaluation fair and standardized. There are three opinions on graduation design: one is the opinion of the instructor, the other is the opinion of the reviewer, and the third is the opinion of the defense Committee.

For example:

The topic of this paper conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is heavy. The topic selection has high academic research (reference) value (great practical guiding significance).

The student has a strong ability to consult documents and materials, and can comprehensively collect information about the examination system. In the process of writing, I can comprehensively apply the knowledge of the examination system and comprehensively analyze the problems existing in the examination system, and I have a strong ability to comprehensively apply knowledge.

The length of the article fully conforms to the requirements of the college, with complete content, scientific hierarchical structure, prominent points, clear logical relationship and certain personal opinions.

The topics are completely consistent, the arguments are prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme. The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification; Rich references and strong timeliness; There is no plagiarism.