So what are the hard indicators? Among the opinions issued by the Ministry of Education this time, * * * put forward ten hard indicators. Let's take a look at some of them:
1. It is not allowed to judge the quality of a paper simply by publications, professional titles, honors and qualifications, so as to prevent "judging articles by publications", "judging articles by publications instead of people" and "judging articles by people".
This indicator first gives some opportunities to people who have no academic qualifications but have solid knowledge.
2. Don't rely too much on international data and journals to prevent papers from being dominant in international journals.
There are many criteria to judge the superiority of international journals, but in fact, domestic journals have a high status, which gives domestic journals a certain positive position.
3. China shall not be deliberately dwarfed and vilified in pursuit of international publishing, and shall not harm national sovereignty, security and development interests.
This article stipulates that the contents of periodicals published by many tutors must be positive and shall not harm the national interests.
4. Indicators such as the number of papers collected by SSCI and CSSCI, citation rate and impact factors should not be simply linked to resource allocation, material rewards and performance pay to prevent papers from being highly rewarded.
The salary standard of many university teachers is linked to the number of papers collected, so many tutors write papers crazily for salary, ignoring their own work as teachers, which brings certain difficulties to university teaching. This index standardizes this point, and will play a certain role in promoting the teaching of college students, which is very good.
The rest of the indicators are published in official website, Ministry of Education, and interested partners can go and have a look.