There is no need to falsify data to prove your proposition. If the real data can't prove your proposition, write down the conclusion and the next guess generously. Science is exploratory in nature, and no one can guarantee that his ideas must be right. Some master tutors will tell students that natural science is not humanities, and things like politics and law should first set propositions and then collect evidence to support them, as long as the logic is consistent, no matter right or wrong; Natural science puts forward hypotheses and then verifies them with real data. Right and wrong are right and wrong, and wrong is rewarded, at least it shows that this road is impassable. Forging data means that your thinking mode is not linked to natural science.

If you want to check, the school will increase a lot of labor costs, and data fraud can't be found out at all, because the subject fields are different, and the methods of judging whether the data is true or false are different, which can't be unified. But I suggest that you can give it or not, and try not to fake it. It's not good after all.