Natural selection, survival of the fittest

I heard that there was a news that caused a strong response in the provincial capital. It's about the recruitment of sales staff in the provincial talent center. On that day, there were many applicants, but only one position was reserved by the employer, and a girl named Zhang Yuanyuan gave her seat to someone else to take the exam. Finally, because of this girl's modesty, the person in charge of the company thought that she was not suitable for working in the sales department, and the interview failed, which made people talk about whether she should have good moral cultivation.

To be an excellent talent, good moral cultivation is essential. However, "natural selection, survival of the fittest", in this fiercely competitive society, if you are too modest and neglect to forge ahead, then you will eventually be eliminated. Give your opinion, don't neglect making progress.

Darwin's "theory of evolution" is considered to be a household name. So, giraffes were finally preserved, but not extinct? It is because with the growth of trees, in order to survive, everyone is scrambling to stretch their necks to eat the leaves on the trees, which will only be too humble, and the deer who do not know how to compete will be abandoned and eventually starve to death on the road; The deer that knows how to go up and the deer that knows how to compete survived and evolved into a "giraffe." Even lower animals understand the truth that "natural selection, survival of the fittest", but how can smart humans not understand it? (using giraffe analogy)

In the advanced society, all walks of life are fighting with each other. In order to gain a firm foothold in the society, they are constantly innovating to attract customers. Therefore, many enterprises have been preserved and continue to work in this enterprising upsurge. Of course, many enterprises are eventually eliminated by society because they don't know how to compete. (contact enterprise)

Let's look at the world film market again. Generally speaking, the foreign film market is broader than that in China. Because of their innovative ideas and advanced technology, their films are excellent. Coupled with professional actors, it can be said to be the icing on the cake. Therefore, foreign films have always been superior to China films. But is it really because foreign technology is more advanced than China's that China will bow to foreign countries? Is it because the proportion of excellent foreign films in the world is higher than that of China that China will give in? If our country wants to "grovel" instead of competing and making progress, then we will really lose. Therefore, in order to develop the film industry in China, many excellent directors are making progress, innovating and never giving in, so the film industry in China is also developing vigorously. (Take the film industry as an example)

In our daily life, we can always be "modest", but when we are living and competing, we should not be "modest" but "strive for it". Only those who strive for the upper reaches and forge ahead can firmly take root in society, but only those who are too humble will be eliminated by society. Dialectical analysis, when can we be modest and when must we make progress?

"Natural selection, survival of the fittest" is always a truth. (strengthen the point of view)

Test analysis: This is a composition composed of many materials, and the relationship between the materials is analyzed one by one. The types of materials are basically unified and opposite. Unity pays attention to the characteristics of * * *, while opposition pays attention to the dialectical relationship between them. This question is antagonistic. Pay attention to the relationship between "competition" and "disdain". In fact, there is a certain correlation between the two. Competition is necessary, and "disdain" is only in competition. From this, we can imagine that "struggle" is for "no struggle", or "no struggle" is the highest state of "struggle"