First of all, the most important thing in writing is to have a sense of purpose, which is also a headache for many candidates. Let me talk about my feelings.

After reading the materials, my first reaction was the friendship between my classmates, which I wrote.

But after careful consideration, I think the core idea of this composition should be the relationship between classmates-these materials emphasize one aspect of the relationship between classmates, that is, how to deal with the relationship between classmates, which leads us to write about maintaining and developing the relationship between classmates with positive qualities such as understanding, tolerance and trust. Whether this can be equated with what you call "friendship" and "love", and whether they have the same meaning, these indefinable standards need to be revised and judged by teachers.

Many experts say that the starting point of this composition is the poisoning case of my roommate at Fudan University. In fact, when writing, I should be able to think of the situation in Ma Jiajue a few years ago, and I can cite some such examples in my composition.

For example (I came up with it myself): the title of the composition (argumentative essay) is "Building a Bridge of Trust and Tolerance", and the argument is that students should trust and tolerate each other. Basic framework: a good classmate relationship needs trust and tolerance, which can be proved by positive examples; The second paragraph-if you don't trust and tolerate your classmates, the relationship will deteriorate and lead to bad consequences. Give counterexamples (Fudan case, Ma Jiajue case, etc.). ); Three paragraphs-look at yourself in the mirror and advocate that we use trust and tolerance to maintain and develop the relationship between classmates. The above methods can be written into an article.

For the above example, I personally think it is the most conventional and basic way, so it is easy to write, but it is difficult to shine. I think many people will write like this, and it is inevitable for teachers to do so when marking papers, unless people with good writing can write an excellent article (because the meaning of the question is narrow, that is, "how to deal with the relationship between classmates", and it is difficult to give play to it without expanding and extending the scope of ideas). In this way, it is difficult to widen the gap in composition scores.

After all, it is the examination room for the college entrance examination. Perhaps more people take a conservative strategy, that is, "publishing articles" and get 42 to 45 points, which is an insurance score. Students who want to get higher marks in Chinese or make achievements in Chinese subjects may adopt the strategy of "giving prizes", that is, scoring more than 50 points or even more than 55 points. If they want to do this, they must write their own way.

Aside from other parts (classical Chinese translation and poetry appreciation are simply cheating), it is easier for the outside world to judge the composition of this Hainan volume, but it is difficult to open the gap. In view of this personal opinion, the grading standard should be adjusted appropriately, which may expand the scope of conception. Otherwise, where do personalized articles come from? So I think the scope should not be too limited.

As for LZ, I don't know how to write it, but the love between classmates is an indispensable part of the relationship. If the author can explain this relationship clearly, he should not digress. But again, if only the love between classmates is emphasized and the paper is strictly conservative, then this is not the core concept, because the materials clearly point out the words "understanding, trust and tolerance".

In short, I hope that the composition will not be a factor affecting your total score.

Finally, I hope LZ can have a good result!

By o