The meaning of achievement: genius or idiot? It's not the grades that have the final say! This sentence, from the heart of the gifted child Nora, is also deeply imprinted in my mind. The most unforgettable part of this book is Nora's cry: grades can't dominate everything! Only unique innovative ideas are the only way to decide a person! At that moment, I was shocked This simple and philosophical remark aroused my infinite reverie and thinking. Yes, but I also value grades, but it seems to be a more important thinking than grades! For example, everyone is an apple bitten by God. Everyone has different specialties, so playing in different places makes different contributions to society. It's no use just talking and not doing. Just like Nora, she has enough preparation plans and plans before doing things, so she can succeed in the end. For example, Xing Linzi, the author of The Life of Life, is paralyzed from birth, but she has a pair of flexible hands, and he has devoted all his experiences to writing. She has unique thoughts and opinions. With these, she created miracles for us and wrote many excellent university works. I think I have the same special thinking ability as Nora. Once in an art class, we were going to make a showcase. When everyone wants to be a jungle and an animal, I think of Vientiane City. When I put forward this idea, my classmates said it was impossible. When I collected pictures and bought materials through many different channels, I finally finished a perfect homework. Grades are very important. Although the results of senior high school entrance examination and college entrance examination are important, a wise mind and creative thinking are more important than an excellent result. Writing Guidance: How to Choose Arguments in Argumentative Writing? The most critical step in writing an argumentative essay is how to prove the central argument with arguments. An article, if there are not enough arguments to prove the central point, even if the point of view is very clear, novel and excellent, can not convince the reader. When some students write argumentative essays, although many arguments are listed in the articles to prove the central point, the articles are still not convincing enough. Why? The common reason is that we don't follow the necessary principles when choosing arguments. Then, when writing an argumentative essay, what principles should be followed when choosing materials for arguments? First, the principle of centralization. When we choose materials as the argument of an argumentative essay, the first and most basic requirement is that the selected argument must be closely around the central argument, and the center of the selected argument must be able to serve the central argument. In short, the center of the selected argument must contain the content contained in the central argument of this argumentative paper. The second is the typical principle. The so-called typicality principle means that when writing an argumentative essay, when choosing arguments, try to choose the most representative and convincing arguments and try to use other common arguments less. () There are some problems to be explained about this typicality, that is, this typicality is relative. For example, an argument is representative, but it is not typical because too many people use it in the same article, which tells us a truth: try to avoid collisions; Another problem is that there are some unusual sayings that are rarely known by many people. Although it is also typical, it lacks a kind of * * * intellectuality and is not representative, so its credibility is not ideal. Therefore, don't think that the argument that everyone uses less is typical. The third is the principle of sufficiency. An argumentative essay should have sufficient explanatory power, and it is impossible without sufficient arguments. Some students quoted only one argument in an article with more than 1000 words. There were too many arguments in the narrative, and only a few words were analyzed and discussed. Such an argumentative essay is not very convincing. Some students, although there are many arguments, just pile them up without effective analysis and discussion. Such an argument is not sufficient. Therefore, an argumentative essay should have at least three or four typical arguments for effective analysis and discussion. However, if you use comparative arguments or enumerated arguments, seven or eight arguments are not too many, but the narrative should be concise and focus on more analysis and discussion. In a word, the argumentative paper does not have enough arguments to demonstrate the central argument and cannot achieve a convincing purpose. Fourth, it is the rational principle. The presentation of the argument is organized and principled, and it is not to use which one comes to mind first. When we outline the composition, we should arrange the relevant arguments in a certain order, generally: write ancient times first, then say modern times; Say domestic first, then foreign; Write what is important first, then what is secondary; Write typical first, then ordinary; The writer is well-known and well-founded, and then unknown and unfounded; First about people, then about animals &; & In a word, the presentation of arguments, like building and repairing houses, should pay attention to certain organization and methods. Casual presentation can only reduce the credibility and persuasiveness of the argument, or confuse the structure of the article. Therefore, the presentation of arguments should not be too casual, and some principles should be followed.