When reading a paper, we often know words, papers, arguments, summaries and so on. So what's the difference between a thesis and a treatise? As for the thesis, I think many authors who first came into contact with it don't know much about it. This article will introduce the works in detail for you.

First of all, the thesis and summary are a sub-column of the thesis, but the summary is a thesis, not a thesis. Generally speaking, the weight of the paper is greater than the summary. In the medical field, there are experimental studies, that is, experimental groups or case groups, but not all reviews.

"Thesis" refers to "argumentative essay", which is a common form of expression in the genre of medical papers and has a specific concept. It is the author's own achievements, experiences and understandings in scientific research, clinic and teaching. It is a written work formed by strict logical argumentation and standardization, and it is the most typical and representative style in medical papers. A "thesis" is an article to discuss and study a certain problem. "Academic papers are articles that systematically and specifically discuss and study certain knowledge"; Scientific papers should discuss some important new knowledge of experiments, theories or observations, or the progress of a known principle in practical application. On the surface, there is not much difference. Especially in medical journals, it is difficult for editors to distinguish between the two.

Some certification standards for works:

1. There are relatively standardized requirements in writing form, including title, author's name, author's unit, region, postcode, Chinese abstract, English abstract, keywords (3-8), preface (introduction), materials (materials) and methods, achievements, discussions (experiences) and references (words in the book) that meet the requirements of the content of the question.

2. Medical papers are normative written works based on the basic materials (original materials) mastered by the author, which are scientifically and rigorously sorted, processed, analyzed and demonstrated.

3. The conclusions expressed in medical works are clear and credible, and the quality and academic value of the papers are high.

4. Medical works should be disposable documents (including systematic review of evidence-based medicine).

The stylistic structure of a paper has all the normative contents and characteristics required by a "paper", and it is published in mainstream legal journals (supplements or essays of non-academic conferences), regardless of whether the published journals are set in the "paper" column. If a paper does not have all the normative contents and characteristics required by a paper, it cannot be regarded as a paper even if it is arranged in the "paper" column of a publication (especially a "law" publication).