Scientific articles are the premise of scientific papers, that is, the research object is in the scientific category, and the content discussed should be true and reliable, based on relative data, real phenomena and existing theories. [[i]] The scientific nature of the paper lies in the scientific nature of the issues discussed; The content of the discussion is authentic and cannot be exaggerated at all; Observe phenomena carefully, fully investigate things, and have enough reliable data; With correct reasoning, the arguments put forward should stand scrutiny. You can't choose materials at will and make subjective assumptions. [(ii)] Scientific papers should be fluent in arts and sciences, standardized in expression, beautifully arranged, logical and readable. Scientific papers should respect facts, have reliable data, be able to repeat, verify and confirm the experimental process, have sufficient arguments, be rigorous in argumentation, be logical in reasoning, be reasonable in data processing, be correct in calculation and have objective conclusions. [(3)] The so-called objectivity refers to the scientific nature of the article. The content of the article reflects that scientific papers are based on scientific research, with a large number of research data as information, in the form of written language, and through orderly analysis and reasoning, the author's own problems and opinions are raised to the theoretical level. Objectivity means that the article must be based on sufficient and reliable experimental data or observation objects. Its data is true and comes from scientific experiments. The whole experimental process can be repeated and can stand verification. Only in this way can the author objectively and truly explain the special contradiction of the research object and the skills and methods adopted by the author to solve the contradiction. Reliability also includes accurate concept, definition, judgment, analysis and conclusion, accurate and appropriate estimation of one's own research results, and realistic evaluation of others' research results. [[iv]] I have also read some papers in which authors pieced together articles for the promotion of professional titles and graduation defense. Such articles are inevitably subjective and often lack sufficient arguments, experimental verification and analysis and comparison. There are also some authors patting their heads to write articles there, and there are several references. This kind of article not only can't jump out of the box of the original literature, but also has no new ideas, which is inevitably suspected of plagiarism. As the saying goes, "learning can't be fake at all", so can writing articles.