Letter to the procuratorate, Fan.
Dear Minister of Justice of Zhou Maoyu,
Hello! Sorry to bother you! I am Han Shuguang, one of the leaders of Shandong Kai Intelligent Source Co., Ltd. On September 4, 2008, our company signed a coal sales contract with Shanxi Huayuan Yuntong Trading Co., Ltd. at Shanxi People's Congress Guest House in Yingze Street, Taiyuan City (the rented place of Wang Huiguang, the legal person of Huayuan Yuntong Trading Co., Ltd.), but during the performance of the contract, I was suspected of defrauding our company of 2742740 yuan.
In order to recover these debts, I have been collecting debts for six years, running back and forth between Jinan and Taiyuan. Only I know the bitter taste, but the Xinghualing District Public Security Bureau of Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province refused to file a case for various reasons and shirked it. I was forced to write to Director Liu Jie of Shanxi Provincial Public Security Department and Secretary Yuan of Shanxi Provincial Committee for help on 20 13 and 20 14. I also posted online for help, but I still failed to recover my hard-earned money. I don't want to say that there is an unknown transaction between Xinghualing Public Security Bureau and Wang Huiguang, but it is a fact. I am a foreigner, it doesn't matter if I have no money, but I stand on this unfair thing. I don't believe that there is no reason. People who break the law can always get away with it. Can law enforcement just sit back and watch?
I used to borrow money from relatives and friends to do coal business. Now in order to pay back the money, I have sold all my property, such as my house. I have no money, no fixed address and no ability to support my family. My wife and children can only suffer with me. I feel sorry for them. In this way, when will it end to live a life of being persecuted, fearful and miserable by creditors every day? I am really desperate, and my life is miserable to the extreme!
12 13 in Shanxi, a unpaid peasant woman was killed at the police station, which aroused widespread concern and deeply hurt my heart. The peasant woman got paid and finally lost her life. I am a debt collector. Although I am still alive, I wish I were dead. Who can make decisions for me, pay me justice and pay my debts? Director Wang Fan of Taiyuan Public Security Bureau apologized for the death of a peasant woman in the police station, and said: Whoever infringes on the interests of the masses, ignores their sufferings and tarnishes the image of Taiyuan Public Security Bureau, then our bureau will take off his hat and smash his job. Secretary Wang Rulin also called for serious handling of the death of a peasant woman at the police station. Why is nobody in charge of my business? Must leaders pay attention to people's lives? * * * A harmonious society under the leadership of the legal society is just a superficial effort and a formality? My six-year sad debt collection experience and my present situation of being down and out have been repeatedly reported to the relevant departments of Shanxi Province. Every time, there is no news. Really nobody cares?
Dear Minister of Justice of Zhou Maoyu, where are you? 12. 13? When answering a reporter's question, the case said this: Will it? 12? 13? The case is an ironclad case that can stand the test of history and law; I am responsible for the case I handle for life! I am convinced that you must be a strict, fair and just person. I sincerely urge you to read this letter, so that you can take the time to understand the case, uphold justice for me, let Wang Huiguang of Shaanxi Huayuan Express Trading Co., Ltd. return my money, and bring a group of criminals such as Wang Huiguang to justice.
Attachment: The course of the case
Shandong Kai Intelligent Source Co., Ltd. and Shanxi Huayuan Express Trading Co., Ltd. signed a coal sales contract at Shanxi People's Congress Guest House (Wang Huiguang's rented place) in Yingze Street, Taiyuan City on September 4, 2008. The buyer is Shandong Kai Intelligent Source Co., Ltd., and the receiver is the thermal power plant of Shandong Branch of Chinalco Co., Ltd. Before Shandong Kai Intelligent Source Co., Ltd. signed the contract, due to the shortage of coal at that time, at the request of Wang Huiguang, the deposit and planning fee of Shanxi Huayuan Yuntong Trading Co., Ltd. totaled 450,000 yuan in three times (200,000 yuan was paid from Jinan Branch of Agricultural Bank of China on August 30, 2004, and in 2008, 1 and 65438. On September 6, 2008, Shandong Kai Intelligent Source Co., Ltd. remitted the first batch of coal payment to Shanxi Huayuan Yuntong Trading Co., Ltd. through our account in Huaxia Bank Jinan High-tech Sub-branch. On June 0, 2008, Shanxi Huayuan Yuntong Trading Co., Ltd. (at this time, the contract period has exceeded three days, and the contract execution period is from September 4, 2008 to September 30, 2008. The contract opened three trains in January, but only this train was opened) to Shandong Kai Intelligent Source Co., Ltd. for 3453 tons of electric coal (total: 1450260 yuan).
After June 5th 10, Wang Huiguang of Shanxi Huayuan Yuntong Trading Co., Ltd. lied about the plan to issue two more wagons and asked Shandong Kai Intelligent Source Co., Ltd. to pay for the coal. Shandong Kai Intelligent Source Co., Ltd. remitted the coal payment to the account of Shanxi Huayuan Yuntong Trading Co., Ltd. on June 8, 2008, with a total payment of 6.65 million yuan. After repeated recovery, Shanxi Huayuan Yuntong Trading Co., Ltd. successively returned the payment of 2.44 million yuan, and returned the payment of 600,000 yuan, 50,000 yuan and 50,000 yuan to our company's account on October 29th, 29th, 60th, 9th, 60th and 20th, 2008 respectively. On February 23, 2008, 65438+ falsely sent us another train of coal, and the result was only 254 tons (total: 127000 yuan). Later, it was said that the railway plan could not come down, and the mine leader was transferred, so coal was no longer sent. Up to now, the loan principal owed to our company is 2742740 yuan, and the total amount of principal plus interest is 4 1, 9 1, 206.72 yuan (as of April 20 13).
Wang Huiguang, the legal representative of Shaanxi Huayuan Express Trading Co., Ltd., has a criminal record, claiming that he was cheated out of 900,000 yuan by a man named Bing Lin. Wang Huiguang asked our company to report the case with him to the Economic Investigation Brigade of Xinghualing District Public Security Bureau of Taiyuan City. From June 5438+February 2008 to April 2009, our company repeatedly reported the case to the Economic Investigation Brigade of Xinghualing District Public Security Bureau in Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province, and its staff shirked that it was an economic dispute and was delayed. After our company invited them to dinner many times, they actually asked us to deal with it with the underworld, which was extremely irresponsible. Unfortunately, our company sent someone to ask the client Wang Huiguang many times on February 20 10. Even though the remaining coal was delivered to our company according to the contract, Wang Huiguang said: I have people from the public security and procuratorate departments, and I have already spent the money. If you want money, it is not fatal. Let me know if you can. ? In the meantime, in front of us, he called a procurator-general many times, which was very arrogant!
20 10, 10 in June, I found a detachment leader named Zhang of Taiyuan Economic Investigation Detachment by looking for someone. At that time, it cost him more than 10 thousand to invite him to dinner and give him a gift. On the third day, the economic investigation detachment replied that it was an economic dispute and would not accept it. We realized that there were people in Wang Huiguang. A friend of Wang Huiguang said: He plays with the police with your money every day, but you can't play with him because you have no money now. It is impossible to work in Taiyuan police without money. Money is dad.
On March 20 13, I wrote a letter to Liu Jie, director of Shanxi Provincial Public Security Department, about the case that Wang Huiguang of Shanxi Huayuan Express Trading Co., Ltd. defrauded our company. Xinghualing Branch of Taiyuan Public Security Bureau informed me to go to Taiyuan on April 20 13 to learn about the case. At that time, a battalion chief surnamed Wang informed me that because I was already in difficulty, he promised to reimburse me for my travel expenses. For personal reasons, I went there in February of 20th/kloc-3rd. I think, with the director's instructions, this case will be carried out. As a result, Xinghualing Public Security Bureau and Taiyuan Economic Investigation Detachment shirked each other and said that the case was not their responsibility. A woman from the Economic Investigation Detachment said: There are many cases like yours, and we can't manage them. We don't want debts (records). But I said: 20 10 I'll report the case. How do you manage the Xinghualing Public Security Bureau? Why don't you care now? During the period, he traveled back and forth between the Economic Investigation Detachment of Taiyuan Public Security Bureau and Xinghualing Public Security Bureau several times, until February 3 1 and February 201were informed by Xinghualing Public Security Bureau that the case had been accepted. When I went there, I found that Wang Huiguang was already there. A policeman named Li Kai mediates between us like a civil dispute, and my heart is cold. This is not a case. During his stay in Wang Huiguang, he said that he paid me 500,000 yuan on 20 10. I said why I didn't receive it. He said that if you can't receive it, you can provide evidence. Officer Li also asked me to provide evidence. I said I brought all my company's accounts. Wang Huiguang returned the receipt of our company, but you can check it. There is no 500,000 yuan as he said. Officer Li asked me to check. I said I'm not a policeman. How can officer Li keep looking? Later, officer Li asked if you had written to Director Liu Jie. I said I really had no choice but to write. He said it was useless for you to write to a high official. In the end, we have the final say, and the county magistrate has the final say. What he said was ridiculous. Then he gave me a separate record. After I signed the record, I said I had a few things to add. He said what's wrong with you? I took the money myself. I'm really sorry. I forgot to mention it just now. At that time, I thought, no matter how fierce you are, just file a case for me. After the transcript, he said that from the materials you provided, Wang Huiguang did not constitute fraud. I said, can you check whether it is a false registered company (a friend of Wang said that he didn't have the money to register the company just to sign a contract with you to cheat you), and find out where the funds in his account went, why he gave more than 900 thousand, and how much money he earned. Officer Li said I needed to provide this evidence. I said that these were all investigated by your police, and it is impossible for us ordinary people to investigate. He said I would answer whatever he asked, and I wouldn't remember what he didn't ask. After recording the materials, he said, I'll let you know when you go back to Shandong.
On the eve of the Spring Festival, Wang Huiguang and his lawyer called many times and said that as long as I dropped the lawsuit, I would be given 200,000 years ago. I told him that as long as you are sincere and give me money, I will drop the lawsuit. Wang Huiguang said: I will play with you to the end and see who can play with whom. It is very arrogant. As a result, he didn't give me money. After the Spring Festival (20 14) and February 17, I called police officer Li and asked if this was the past trip. He asked me to bring the contract and invoice between our company and the power plant, so I went to Taiyuan. After seeing the contract and invoice between our company and the power plant, he said: When I saw this thing, I knew Wang Huiguang didn't lie to you. You are legally responsible for lying about the case and framing others. I said: Officer Li told me that the price of coal was 640 yuan per ton, but the price I gave to the power plant was 626 yuan per ton. Do you think he is right? You can't just listen to him. The company conducts transactions according to invoices. Later, he asked me to go back to the hotel and wait for his call. After waiting for three days, I called him and asked him how the case was going. He said, go back to Shandong and wait for my call. I went back to Shandong.
On March 5, 20 14, I received a phone call from police officer Li and refused to file a case. I asked him why he didn't file a case (in fact, I had a hunch that this would happen after he accepted it), and he said several reasons for not filing a case:
1, Wang Huiguang let me make money from the power plant.
2. Wang Huiguang gave Bing Lin 940,000 yuan, of which 500,000 forest soldiers were deducted as activity funds and liquidated damages (it is said that we don't want the liquidated damages under the station wagon plan. God, we let him deliver coal every day. How can there be a breach of contract? Besides, how can there be a penalty of 500 thousand yuan, and the freight for a train to our Shandong is only1.20 thousand)
3. Wang Huiguang has been giving us a positive refund (starting from 20 10, he only gave me less than 100000, which I think is unreasonable).
I asked a few questions:
1. Have you investigated the false registration of Wang Huiguang company?
2. Why did Wang Huiguang give Bing Lin 940,000 yuan? Is there so much profit in Wang Huiguang? What's their profit?
3. Is it necessary to check the whereabouts of funds in Wang Huiguang and whether there is any misappropriation of transferred funds?
4. How much does Wang Huiguang owe us after three months' investigation by Xinghualing Public Security Bureau?
5. Is there commercial bribery in the expense evidence provided by Wang Huiguang?
6. Does Wang Huiguang use our company's money for special purposes?
7. Do you want to check the materials that Wang Huiguang reported Bing Lin fraud to Xinghualing Public Security Bureau around June 65438+1October 65438+May 2009?
The police of Li and Zhang Brigade of Xinghualing Public Security Bureau said that they needed me to provide the above evidence. Needless to say, it's no use saying that I can't provide it. I asked them: Do the people's police handle cases like you? Where can we ordinary people find out and let us live? They said that if they refused to accept it, they could appeal to the public security bureau at a higher level for reconsideration or to the procuratorate, but any fool could understand that Wang Huiguang had bribed those police officers. I am a helpless civilian and can only ask for help. If the illegal act is not punished as it should be, where is the legal principle? Where is justice? What are the embarrassing places? The attorney general is at the top of the temple, holding the sword of law, and will definitely give me a clear statement. I am willing to take legal responsibility for the above facts.
Shandong kai intelligent yuan co., ltd
Han Shuguang
20 15. 1.26
Letter to the procuratorate, Fan.
To the Supreme People's Procuratorate:
In the current national environment, it is really unbelievable that our judicial system still handles such cases. The reason why I tell you the situation like this is because I can guarantee with my personality that if the facts mentioned are false, I can compensate with my life.
Judge Liu Jie of wafangdian city People's Court colluded with the parties, fabricated auction facts and forged auction documents, and was suspected of dereliction of duty. The facts are as follows:
1. Case history: In 2004, Dalian Carbon Fiber Co., Ltd. and Dalian Yongze Carbon Material Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Yongze in Jinzhou District where the company is located) initiated a civil lawsuit, which was tried by Dalian Intermediate People's Court for more than three years and ended in failure. According to civil jurisdiction, it shall be executed by Dalian Intermediate People's Court according to law. However, because the husband of Zou Dan, the legal representative of Yongze Company, was then the mayor of wafangdian city, Zou Dan and others illegally transferred the case to the wafangdian city court for execution. In this regard, the company and Zhongchang Village in Jinzhou District have repeatedly raised jurisdictional objections to the Dalian Intermediate People's Court, with no results.
2. Illegal fact: Liu Jie, a judge of Wafangdian Court, did not give time to repay the assets of Xingke Company in production in order to please the leaders and seek personal gain during the execution of the case.
1. Low price evaluation: 1. The company's 6,500-square-meter factory building, office building, boiler room substation and supporting equipment with a value of more than 25 million yuan are only evaluated as 7.92 million yuan. However, the appraiser entrusted for the first time is not qualified for evaluation, and the appraiser will be replaced again after the parties raise objections. Xingke repeatedly applied for re-appraisal and ignored it.
2. Fictitious fact low-price auction: Since the factory building was mortgaged to Jinzhou Sub-branch of Dalian Agricultural Bank in 2002, the first owner of the factory building should be China Agricultural Bank. However, for the purpose of possessing property, Liu Jie and others made a judgment declaring the mortgage of ABC invalid. After that, Liu Jie and others auctioned Xingke real estate one after another, but no one bid, which led to various schools. But what is terrible is that somehow the auction deadline is September, 2008 1, and Liu Jie always calls Xingke, Agricultural Bank of China and Zhongchang Village before the auction deadline. But unexpectedly, on April 26th, 2009, Liu Jie delivered the civil ruling (2006) No.581to Xingke, and ruled that Xingke real estate should be auctioned at a low price of 64 1.925 million yuan on September 2nd, 2008.
3. Forged auction documents are full of loopholes:
First of all, the Company checked the documents with Wafangdian Court and Dalian Juncheng Auction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Juncheng) and confirmed the facts as follows. Cheng Jun clearly pointed out in the auction formula released by the media on August 5, 2008 that the auction deadline was September 2008 1 day 15. In the documents provided by the court and Cheng Jun, the registration time of all bidders is shown as September 2, 2009. The registration time is after the bidding deadline.
Secondly, according to the law, bidders should pay the bid bond within the specified time after registration. If the bidder fails to pay the bid bond, its registration is invalid. In this case, Wafangdian Court, Juncheng Auction House and bidders have never provided or produced any documentary evidence of paying a bid bond of RMB 6,543,800+0.95 million to the parties.
Thirdly, in the auction report on September 2, 2008 provided by the court, the date of April 2009 15 was clearly left on the fax of the bidder's ID card, which once again proved that the so-called auction on September 2, 2008 was fictitious and forged in the later period.
The date when Wafangdian No.4 Court provided the so-called auction ruling was September 3, 2008, that is, September 2, 2008, and the court's ruling was released soon, only one day apart. According to the law, the court can only make legal documents after the bidder pays all the bidding money to the auction company and the auction company pays the money to the court account. According to the bank's process at that time, it could not be completed in one day anyway. When the company questioned Liu Jie and asked him to show evidence of the bidder's payment, Liu Jie actually said that the bidder paid in cash. How can a cash transaction of nearly 7 million be believed? Even if cash is paid, the collection evidence of auction house and court should be provided, but Liu Jie and others simply ignored this legitimate request.
The most incomprehensible thing is that the shareholders of Dalian Yongze New Carbon Materials Co., Ltd. set up a liquidation group to organize liquidation within 15 days from the date of the ruling of Jin Min and Zi Chu No.500 (2006) issued on October 29th, 2006. That is to say, on September 3, 2008, Dalian Yongze New Carbon Materials Co., Ltd., the executor of the application, did not have the subject qualification. How can a subject without subject qualification become an applicant?
The fact that carbon fiber owes Yongze debt exists in itself. We can go back to the procedure of evaluating the auction, but they can't. Zou Dan, all his money belongs to Zou Dan, and they have revoked Yongze in industry and commerce. Because Yongze Company still owns 49% of my shares, I can't claim rights. ) Now the formalities are incomplete. In fact, Zou Dan has got the money that the enterprise owes Yongze. Yongze Company made a profit of 20 million, giving me 49%, nearly100000, and the enterprise only owed 7 million. The main purpose is to develop carbon fiber in Dalian.
This year, under the premise of normal operation of enterprises, enterprises were forced to stop working despite the intervention of procuratorial organs. After half a year, the research team of carbon fiber and composite materials 100 people has been fragmented.
To sum up, it fully shows that the fact that Liu Jie, a judge of Wafangdian Court, colluded with the parties and the auction company to forge national legal documents is conclusive. We implore you to uphold the dignity of the law, protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties and severely punish criminals according to law. But the black hand behind it is even more terrible. Liu Jie is just a pawn. For their purposes, they can ignore the lives of others.
XXX
Date, year and month
Letter to the procuratorate, Fan Wensan
Leaders:
Hello!
Yancheng Court of Luohe City, Henan Province has always owed me 700,000 yuan, and I have reflected the situation to (Luohe Municipal People's Congress, Municipal Procuratorate, Luohe Intermediate People's Court, and President Zhang Liyong of the Provincial High Court). Under such circumstances, the Yancheng court said that it would give me 65438+ 10,000 yuan, which later turned into 50,000 yuan in aid, provided that I had to write a letter of commitment. After Director Jin finished writing the manuscript, he asked Dean He to read it again. Director Jin put the phone down and revised it so that I could copy it. Because of the difficulties of life, someone asked me for an account, so I was forced to write a letter of commitment. I now have a draft commitment letter written by director Jin as proof! (See the copy of Director Jin's handwritten manuscript)
Two presidents of Yancheng Court in Luohe City gave me ideological work: President Wang of Yancheng Court said (after this village, there is no shop. If you don't want this 50 thousand, there will be nothing in the future. You should cooperate with us well. He, president of Yancheng Court, said: (The Provincial High Court gave instructions for a fair settlement, but did not say how much money to give you. Where are you going to sue, or shall we handle it? Say you have the ability to sue! )
The Yancheng District Court of Luohe City, Henan Province broke its word and reported to the Luohe Municipal People's Congress that it must be resolved to my satisfaction and threatened me to write a letter of commitment below. No fundraising, no petition! ? I want the same situation and the same solution. Several other fund-raising funds have been paid, and my 700,000 fund-raising funds should be paid to me with interest!
The court in Yancheng District of Luohe City sold state-owned assets at a low price, deducted fund-raising funds, dredged court relations and got fund-raising funds, threatening me to write a letter of commitment. I raised 700,000 yuan, gave me 50,000 yuan in relief, and threatened not to sue or petition. I strongly asked to see the bankruptcy fund allocation plan, but He, vice president of the Yancheng District Court of Luohe City, refused to see it. There are great doubts in this! Please investigate and solve!
When the inspection team came to Luohe for the first time, President Wang of Yancheng District Court told me to listen to him and rest assured! Be sure to solve it for me! However, after the inspection team left, it was not solved and I was not seen! Why do we have the same fund-raising procedures at the same time? Others can take it, but mine can't. Who has my 700,000 fund?
XXX
Date, year and month
Guess you like:
1. model letter to the procuratorate
2. Write a thank-you letter to the procuratorate.
Thank you for your letter.
4. A model letter of commendation from the procuratorate
5. Letter of introduction from the procuratorate
6. A letter from honesty and self-discipline to family members
7. Letters to detainees