At present, the national civil service examination will begin on June 13. Although many companies will have their own interview questions, every interviewer may face the same problem, that is, how to make a good self-presentation in the interview. Because no matter which employer wants to determine the talents suitable for the unit, it needs to know the basic situation of each interviewer, and self-introduction is one of the ways to know. For self-presentation, many people will first care about which stage of the interview to examine. One of my students once asked me such a question: "Mr. Dai Bin, will the self-presentation begin at the interview?" Admittedly, most people may subconsciously think that self-statement will be asked at the beginning of the interview. But in fact, not all self-statements require candidates to make self-statements at the beginning of the interview, but may be investigated in the middle of the interview or even in the last interview question. And it is very important that the question of self-introduction in the interview is not necessarily like "self-introduction" in the traditional sense. For example, the examiner may not ask you directly: "Please introduce yourself briefly." Judging from the validity of the interview, it is easy for candidates to make full preparations in advance simply by asking them to "introduce themselves", so there are two shortcomings: first, it is impossible to observe the candidates' on-the-spot reaction ability, and the interview is to see the candidates' reaction speed to the questions in a short time; Second, it can't truly reflect the real situation and thoughts of candidates, because in the case of preparing in advance, candidates can easily "hide" their "shortcomings" in advance, and at the same time deliberately highlight their "strengths", which is not conducive to the examiner's comprehensive and accurate measurement of whether candidates are suitable for the positions to be recruited. Therefore, in this case, the interview questions are generally "distorted" to a certain extent. Instead of directly letting the candidates know that the examiner is here to examine the self-presentation, they implicitly ask the candidates to introduce themselves from one side. For self-introduction, the examiner will not ask the candidates to make a "comprehensive introduction", but will make a "partial introduction" from a certain angle. This kind of introduction is often qualified and won't let candidates talk about their experiences. At this point, some people may ask, "Mr. Dai Bin, should the self-statement be longer or shorter?" My opinion on this issue is that it should not be too long. Answer according to the limited conditions in the topic, and do not exceed the limited conditions in the topic. Moreover, we should adhere to such a big principle: when talking about advantages, we should be "objective in facts, long-term in vision and moderate in attitude" and "calm and confident" when talking about disadvantages. Talking about advantages requires "objective facts, long-term vision and moderate attitude". The "objective fact" here means that the advantages mentioned cannot be divorced from reality, and it is best to be "moderate". "Long-term vision" refers to a clear view of advantages, that is, the current advantages are only temporary, not permanent, and we need to make continuous efforts in the future to maintain or even surpass the current "advantages". "Moderate attitude" means that one can be confident, but not conceited. As for "advantages", candidates are always "gentle" when describing their personal "advantages", rather than "showing off" their own advantages smugly. When talking about shortcomings, we should be "calm, optimistic and confident". "Calm" means not avoiding your own shortcomings and treating them as "inevitable" phenomena rather than "accidental" phenomena that need to be covered up. "Self-confidence" means that you will not be blindly pessimistic because you have certain shortcomings. When interviewing, talk about your own shortcomings, whether pointed out by yourself or displayed in your resume, and be "confident" when presenting yourself. In fact, candidates should express such a message in the interview, and think that "shortcomings can be reformed" with "confidence", and at the same time "shortcomings" come from their own "immaturity" rather than personal attitude. Here I want to give an example. A candidate once asked me this question: "Mr. Dai Bin, I'm not a graduate of a prestigious school, and I only have a bachelor's degree, and I have no grassroots work experience. My major is economics. Every exam will compete with many people with high academic qualifications and rich work experience for a position. Can I do that? Even if you pass the written test, the interview will definitely not be as good as theirs. Do I still have to take the exam? " After listening to this examinee's question, I really have mixed feelings. It is true that people who are born in prestigious schools, have received higher education and have rich work experience are often excellent people, but it does not mean that we "ordinary candidates" need to give up. Because everyone will have their own advantages, similarly, candidates who look "ordinary" on the surface will also have their unusual side. So my answer to the candidates at that time was "two reasons should not be given up: first, the civil service examination is to select people who are suitable for working in government agencies to be civil servants, and the most important thing here is" suitability "rather than" Excellence ". Just as the candidate who eventually becomes a civil servant is not necessarily the best of all candidates, it must be the most suitable for that position. Whether you can become a civil servant is not directly related to Excellence. It is directly related to whether candidates meet the specific job requirements of civil service positions. Second, the civil servant interview is actually a comprehensive measure of the personal quality of the interviewer. Famous schools, high academic qualifications and rich work experience are only some of the measuring factors, not all. If candidates can show their advantages in the interview, and at the same time, it is best to directly connect their advantages with the specific job requirements of civil servants' positions and fully prove that they are suitable candidates, then even candidates who are not famous schools, have high academic qualifications and rich work experience have great opportunities to stand out. The key is ". After talking about the principle of self-talk, let's look at a "self-talk" subject with certain restrictions after "deformation". And take this topic as an example to talk about how to make a good self-statement in the interview. In what ways do you think you are more suitable for this position in our unit? Analysis: First of all, whether candidates are suitable for recruiting positions mainly depends on the following aspects: First, from the perspective of personal professional knowledge, generally speaking, most civil servants have specific professional restrictions on recruiting positions, and few have no professional restrictions (except specific positions). Therefore, for candidates who are suitable for recruitment positions, the first thing to look at is whether the major is right. Then some candidates may ask: "Mr. Dai Bin, under normal circumstances, candidates who meet the registration conditions are all counterparts, so how to reflect the advantages of personal professional knowledge?" Here, how to reflect the advantages of personal professional knowledge will vary from person to person. There are two advantages in professional knowledge: one is the advantage in academic performance, and the other is the advantage in practical operation ability. For fresh candidates with good grades, of course, when answering this question, you can mention your school achievements in your statement and prove your advantages in professional knowledge with excellent school achievements. There is a key point here. Candidates should mainly attribute their excellent school performance to the hard training of teachers and personal diligence, and avoid saying things like "I have a high talent", "I have a strong ability to accept" and "I have excellent grades since I was a child", which will give people the impression of "overestimating myself" and is not conducive to getting high marks in the interview. When answering this question, we should be careful not to give the examiner a feeling of "no intention to study, no diligence and no love for this major" during the school period. In terms of the advantages of professional knowledge, we should pay more attention to the practical application of professional knowledge, emphasize the love of professional knowledge, but pay attention to practical application, and emphasize that we have been cared and loved by teachers in the process of learning professional knowledge and learned a lot of practical knowledge. For the reason that the academic performance is not particularly good, candidates can answer this question: The reason is that their examination methods are relatively weak, and they can't pass the exam. Their learning attention is often not on the exam topics, which affects their examination results to a certain extent, but their attitude towards the exam is very serious, and their teachers are also very good at their education. What they have learned at school can already meet the requirements of society. For non-fresh candidates, it should be emphasized that they are engaged in occupations related to their majors after graduation. Tell the examiner that he is a lucky man. After graduation, he met very professional and capable leaders and colleagues, got a lot of help from them, learned a lot of professional knowledge at work, and improved a lot after graduation. When I first started working, because of my lack of work experience, many professional knowledge I learned in school could not be well applied to my work. But with my work experience, I have been able to make good use of my professional knowledge in my work, so from the perspective of professional knowledge, I am very suitable for recruiting positions. Secondly, from the perspective of personal character, when it comes to whether the candidate's personality is suitable for recruiting positions, it is necessary to analyze the commonness and individuality of the candidate's personality requirements from the position of civil servant. Judging from the commonness of civil servants' personality, there are several common requirements: "modesty and prudence, calmness, courage and prudence, courage to take responsibility, unity and the overall situation, obedience to superiors." Candidates should incorporate these requirements into their answers when making self-statements. At the same time, we should also pay attention to the personality of civil servants. To prepare for this, candidates should review the specific requirements of the positions they are applying for before the interview, such as which department they are assigned to and which position they want to work in other places. , and inquire about the specific business of the applicant on the website. From the business information and recruitment position information of these units, we can find the special requirements of specific positions for the interviewer's personality. In short, we should reflect our personality in a targeted manner. No matter from the personality commonness or personality required by civil servants, one is a suitable candidate for civil servants' occupation, and the other is a person who can engage in civil servants' occupation for a long time. Third, the perspective of personal experience The personal experience here mainly refers to two aspects: school experience and work experience. For fresh graduates, of course, the main experience refers to the school experience, so the school experience mainly includes work experience, study experience, award-winning experience and work-study experience. The work experience in the school is mainly divided into: the work experience of the school youth league Committee (league cadres), the work experience of the student union (student union cadres), the work experience of the social league (community cadres) and the work experience of the class collective (class cadres). For candidates, this part of the statement should be focused, focusing on their best side. What needs to be emphasized here is that if the interviewee's student work experience at school is very rich, covering almost all aspects, please note that the presentation time must not be too long, and only the most representative parts are selected. On the one hand, the presentation time is tedious, on the other hand, it may make the interviewer feel that the candidate is "showing off", which is easy to cause the examiner's "bad impression" and is not conducive to getting high marks in the interview. The study experience in school is mainly scholarship. If you have won a scholarship, you can make a simple statement. If you don't get a scholarship, you can avoid talking about it. Award-winning experiences at school include sports, literature and art, and science and technology awards. One thing to note here is that there is no need to list specific award-winning projects. As Mr. Dai Bin said in the interview, "I won the first prize in the second essay contest of" Contemporary College Students' Theory of Three Represents Theory "and the first prize in the essay contest of" Associating the Future ". Imagine if Mr. Dai Bin listed his "awards" to the interviewer, would the interviewer have a good impression? No. Moreover, such a list is completely unnecessary, because the complete and specific award-winning experience has been displayed in the candidate information. In fact, the correct expression of the above situation should be as follows: "I have won some awards in the essay competition, have certain expertise in article writing, and can engage in (be competent for) certain word processing work in the office." For the work-study experience, it can be said that many people have neglected this aspect. In fact, this kind of experience can better reflect the spirit and perseverance of candidates, that is, candidates can still complete their studies by their own efforts under the economic downturn. This experience itself is a commendable experience. If candidates can reflect their experiences in this field well, they should get a lot of impression points. For non-fresh graduates, that is, on-the-job personnel, work experience should be emphasized. The point to be emphasized here is to pay attention to the experience of teamwork and self-organization and coordination. In short, a big principle is that candidates can't make examiners feel that they have strong personal ability, but teamwork is not good and their ability is not outstanding in the case of collective cooperation. As an administrative organ, the really needed civil servants should have excellent quality, strong discipline and cooperation. Generally speaking, I have good quality and can play a greater role in the collective. What I want to emphasize here is, don't talk about job-hopping, don't talk about your previous lack of talent, don't talk about the shortcomings or shortcomings of your past leaders and colleagues, and don't talk about the low salary of your past job. Tell the examiner that the past experience is beautiful and is of great help to their own development and ability improvement.