? Teaching quality-the lifeline of the school

2065438+May 25, 2008 Chen Anxi High School

The school has two very important lines, one is the so-called "nerve line" about financial work, and the other is the so-called "lifeline" about teaching quality. Which is important, the "nerve line" cannot be touched and the "lifeline" cannot be lost. If the teaching quality of a school is not good, the parent society will not recognize it. How can a school that is not recognized by parents become an excellent school? The competent department does not allow, no matter which principal will regard teaching quality as an important part of school work, or the center of all work, he will always make unremitting efforts, and constantly improving teaching quality is also the pursuit of every school.

This afternoon, the seminar on teaching quality evaluation of Shanghai University Basic Education Group was held in the stepped classroom on the first floor of the high school attached to Shangda University. The principal in charge of teaching, the person in charge of teaching and research, and the teachers of Quanzhou experimental high school and primary school who are working in the group school attended the seminar. Director Shi introduced the teaching quality evaluation index system of Shanghai University Basic Education Group. Director Shi made a detailed introduction from the background, main principles, main chapters, evaluation focuses and several issues that need to be explained. I wonder, why should the group formulate an evaluation index system for teaching quality? Can such a high standard evaluation index really be implemented? What guidance can we get from it?

It should be said that the affiliated schools of Shanghai University Basic Education Group still have advantages. The high school affiliated to Shanghai University is also a model high school in Shanghai, and Baoshan Experimental Middle School is also a famous junior high school. Teaching quality is also in the forefront in the whole region. Then, why should the group formulate an evaluation index system for teaching quality? I think, one is that under the background of the new college entrance examination, the competition in education is more intense. Whoever does not seize the development opportunity may fall behind quickly or even be eliminated. One is that the group is not satisfied with the existing achievements, water flows downwards, people go upwards, and they take the lead and do not admit defeat. This spirit of going to the basic education group and constantly surpassing itself is boosting. One is the unfinished main task of the national "Twelfth Five-Year" education development plan mentioned by Director Shi, and it is also the main measure of the current national basic education reform. Another is the main problems existing in schools at present: the cognitive level-teachers only have a technical understanding of teaching at the class level and lack an essential understanding at the curriculum level; Design level-teaching design always stays in an isolated class design, and it is impossible to systematically design teaching from the perspective of the complete learning process of goals, learning, homework and testing; Operational level-classroom teaching, homework, testing and evaluation are separated from each other. From this point of view, it is very necessary to formulate this evaluation index system.

Can such a high standard evaluation index really be implemented? As director Shi said, no school can implement it at present. Is the evaluation system set too high, or does it not conform to the current school reality? Director Shi said that this evaluation index is a guiding index for the next stage of development, and it will reach the standard after several years of development. "If a worker wants to do a good job, he must sharpen his tools first." What does it mean to plan ahead, what does it mean to be far-sighted, and what does it mean that the soldiers and horses have not moved their grain and grass first? Although it is a guiding evaluation index, it must be improved year by year. First of all, the school puts forward the plan that needs to be improved and solved in that year according to the index, and puts forward specific goals, and then the group evaluates it. The evaluation adopts the trinity method, that is, integrating the data provided by urban quality monitoring, the feedback from the district teaching and research section to the school, and the observation of the group on the usual teaching management and classroom teaching in the school to give the final result. It can be seen that it is imperative for the group to formulate this evaluation index, but it is only progressing steadily. Only at present, the Group's tracking of the teaching quality of its schools is in place, and its operability and direction are very clear. From the observation in these two weeks, it can be seen that the supervision of the middle school attached to Shanghai University on the teaching process, or the teachers' consciousness since enlightenment and introspection in the teaching process, is quite terrible. Every class is so carefully prepared that it can closely follow the requirements of Shanghai college entrance examination-thinking-oriented examination.

What guidance can we get from it? Why Shanghai's educational reform and development has always been at the forefront of the country, leading the educational reform, and what are the reasons for its success? Sweep away the dust of time and connect the chapters of memory in series. Have we noticed that Shanghai not only has a brand-new concept of development education, but also many development ideas and measures full of reform wisdom? Shanghai's educational reform has always had a sense of being ahead of the times and opportunity, and has constantly pushed the educational reform to a new height?

As Wei Jia, deputy director of the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, said: "The compulsory education stage is the stage of laying the foundation. The thicker the foundation, the greater the future space. High schools should do characteristic construction, and in the future, they should change from stratified education to classified education. " Su Ming, director of the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, said: "No matter what level and type of education, Shanghai should have a say in the international arena, and its international evaluation should be first-class, which fully meets the requirements of modernization. This is a very difficult place for the next step of reform and development, and it is also our pursuit. "

So, what I want to say is that the quality of teaching is really the lifeline of a school. To improve the quality of teaching, we should pay attention to scientific methods, establish a value orientation view with educating people as the core, start with the top-level design of school curriculum, truly base ourselves on the classroom, really want benefits from the classroom, want quality from the classroom, think about problems from the classroom and innovate from the classroom. We can't improve teaching only by time, but at the expense of students' rest and play time. That is not worth the loss, but also quick success. Not "educating people", but killing children's spirituality. It is necessary to improve teaching performance by cultivating students' good habits and qualities. Combined with the evaluation index of teaching quality, this paper makes a comprehensive and objective evaluation from three first-class indicators: teaching management, classroom teaching and teaching effect.