65438+February 2 1 news, this morning, the arson case of Hangzhou nanny, which has attracted much public attention, will be heard in Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court. In the early morning of June 22 this year, the suspect Mo Huanjing set fire, resulting in the death of the hostess of the employer and her three children. Because the incident was too tragic, it caused continuous concern in society.
The picture shows a burning building.
12 17, Lin Shengbin, the victim's family in this case, announced the opening date in Weibo. He said that he didn't know how to describe his feelings at this moment, and he believed that the law would have a fair judgment. It is also reported that Lin Shengbin has given up civil compensation, and its only appeal is to severely punish the suspects.
Sad scene
-Nanny set fire, employer "wife and children in heaven"
It is reported that at 5 o'clock in the morning of June 22 this year, a fire broke out in the home of a household on the 0/8th floor of Hangzhou Blue Qianjiang High-end Residential Area/KLOC-,and the hostess Zhu Xiaozhen and her three children were killed. After the public security organ cleared the scene, it was determined that this was a criminal case of arson. The nanny Mo Huanjing was criminally detained by the police on suspicion of arson.
According to Weibo data, on June 23rd, the day after the case happened, Lin Shengbin, the husband of the victim Zhu Xiaozhen and the father of three children, opened Weibo under the name of "wife and children are in heaven", and kept updating it, telling the story of the case and its follow-up, which aroused strong response from netizens? Pay close attention. Within a period of time after the case was exposed, issues such as high-rise fire safety and nanny selection mechanism were also reported by many media, which caused widespread concern.
On June 28th, the Hangzhou Public Security Bureau applied to the Hangzhou People's Procuratorate for approval to arrest the suspect Mo Huanjing for arson and theft, and revealed that Mo Huanjing had repeatedly stolen family property while working as a domestic nanny at his employer's house. After examination according to law, the People's Procuratorate of Hangzhou approved the arrest of Mo Huanjing, a suspect in the "Blue Qianjiang arson case", on July 1 day, and filed a public prosecution on August 2 1 day.
On August 2 1 day, the People's Procuratorate of Hangzhou notified the case.
Nanny involved in gambling
-the case is complicated and significant, and the trial is postponed.
According to the indictment submitted by Hangzhou People's Procuratorate, the defendant Mo Huanjing has been addicted to gambling for a long time. During his time as a nanny in the victim Zhu Xiaozhen's home, he repeatedly went to Zhu Xiaozhen's home to steal valuable and heavy items for pawn, or borrowed money from Zhu Xiaozhen on the grounds of wheat house, and all the proceeds were used for gambling, which was extravagant. The indictment also revealed that the night before the incident, Mo Huanjing gambled online with his mobile phone and lost more than 60,000 yuan. In order to continue to raise gambling money, Mo Huanjing decided to put out the fire first and then put out the fire to gain Zhu Xiaozhen's gratitude, so as to borrow money again, which eventually led to the death of Zhu Xiaozhen and his three children, and caused the loss of the victim's house and adjacent houses of more than 2.57 million yuan.
Some media recently reported that the case was originally scheduled to be heard a few days ago1October 1 1, but due to the complexity of the case, the case was postponed for three months with the approval of the Zhejiang Higher People's Court. "After half a year's hard waiting, the court will finally open on 2 1 this month." Lin Shengbin revealed the news of the upcoming trial in the latest Weibo. According to media reports, the "Blue Qianjiang Arson Case" will be heard in Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court at 9: 00 am on February/KLOC-0.
The victim's family gave up civil compensation.
-What's the impact on the verdict?
According to media reports, the day before the trial, Lin Shengbin said that he had decided to give up the civil compensation for Mo Huanjing and only asked the court for a heavier sentence. Lawyer Lin Shengbin also told the media that giving up civil compensation would help the court to hear the case quickly. Once there is civil compensation, the court should consider how much the loss is and how to compensate, so the speed will be slower. The victim's only request to the court is to severely punish the suspect. So, can Lin Shengbin's only complaint really affect the trial? Wang, a lawyer at Beijing Law Firm, told reporters that giving up civil compensation "will have an impact on heavier judgments".
Wang explained that if the defendant can get the understanding of the victim and his family, he will generally be given a lighter punishment as appropriate, but the victim has shown an unforgivable attitude.
An Xiang, director of Beijing Dexiang Law Firm, also believes that the victim's abandonment of civil appeal "may have a certain impact" on sentencing. He told reporters that "in this case, the victim refused to pay compensation very decisively, cutting off the defendant's idea of getting a lighter punishment through understanding." However, An Xiang said that when trying criminal cases, the judge should first consider conviction and then sentencing. The victim's attitude has nothing to do with conviction and has limited influence on sentencing.
Nanny repents in prison.
-Will it affect sentencing?
Before the trial, some media disclosed that Mo Huanjing had written an apology letter to Lin Shengbin in Hangzhou Detention Center. In the letter, she said, "If my death makes you feel better, I really want to die at once." "The defendant said that he has the will to repent and there are many ways. For example, even if the victim doesn't mention it, she can still fully express her remorse in court. " An Xiang said that although the victim did not mention it, the defendant can still make compensation efforts and make compensation in full accordance with the law or even higher standards in order to strive for a lighter sentence. However, according to Mo Huanjing's defense lawyer Dang Linshan, in an interview with the media, Mo Huanjing has no compensation ability and the consequences are very serious.
Wang also told reporters that Mo Huanjing's confession will indeed become a lighter sentence, but it is not enough to affect the absolute "lighter" in this case, because its harm is far less than that of the victim.
The nanny said, "I didn't want to kill anyone."
-Will it lead to a lack of motive?
The reporter noted that the Hangzhou People's Procuratorate prosecuted Mo Huanjing for arson and theft, which did not involve the so-called intentional homicide. Dang Linshan also told the media that Mo Huanjing's motive was to light a small fire and then put it out, so that Zhu Xiaozhen could thank her and she would borrow money again. She always admitted that her motive was not murder.
An Xiang also explained the charges when interviewed by reporters. He said that arson is one of the crimes that endanger public safety. The characteristic of this kind of crime is that the behavior of the perpetrator infringes on the interests of the unspecified majority and does not need to kill a specific person. "You just need to know that the act of setting fire does not necessarily burn a family or even burn more people, but you still pursued or let this result happen, and it finally happened, so whether the defendant has a specific intention to kill a family will not have any impact on the judgment." An Xiang further explained.
Wang believes that at least the intention of "killing people" is obvious. He said that there are two situations of "intentional homicide", one is "I want to kill you" and the other is "I set it on fire, whether you die or not, but it is likely to die". This indulgence also belongs to the category of intention.
An Xiang added, "This case eventually caused the death of others and must be severely punished, but it is not the death penalty. If the death penalty is imposed, it depends on whether it is executed immediately or suspended for two years. These are places where judges have certain discretion. " "If you can actively compensate and get the understanding of your family, the probability of being sentenced to death is relatively small, but this case is more difficult." Dang Linshan said in an interview with the media before the trial.