Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Resume - Before the Xuanwumen Rebellion, why did Li Yuan support Prince Li Chengjian instead of Li Shimin?
Before the Xuanwumen Rebellion, why did Li Yuan support Prince Li Chengjian instead of Li Shimin?
Liu Bang and Lv Zhi Rebellion in Han Dynasty, Li Yuan and Li Shimin Rebellion in Tang Dynasty, and Zhao Kuangyin and Zhao Guangyi Rebellion in Song Dynasty were all "husband and wife succession", "father and son succession" and "brother succession". The reason is that there were actually two founding monarchs in their dynasty, either husband and wife or father and son.

Therefore, the power of Lv Zhi, Li Shimin and Zhao Guangyi is not terrible, but they can control state affairs. They were "shareholders" in the cause of rebellion, and the "presidents" of the emperor were Liu Bang, Tang Gaozu and Zhao Kuangyin. Lv Zhi, Li Shimin and Zhao Guangyi are equivalent to "supervisors". They all have real military power and the right to speak. There are half of them in the world, and they are also the real kings who fight side by side.

Since ancient times, partnership business has been difficult to do, even for couples, fathers and sons, and brothers. Liu Bangzhi was in the world, regardless of his "commitment" to the Lu family, and began to plan to abolish the prince. Tang gaozu was determined to win the world, regardless of his repeated assurances that he would pass the throne to Li Shimin, make Li Jian a prince and compete with Li Shimin for leadership. Zhao Kuangyin.

In the face of power, people cannot stand the test. As "chairmen", Liu Bang, Li Yuan and Zhao Kuangyin are all trying to turn "home world" into "home world", while as "supervisors", Lv Zhi, Li Shimin and Zhao Guangyi are trying to maintain their original commitment of "home world", which smacks of "honoring promises".

Political power comes from the gun.

Lv Zhi, Li Shimin and Zhao Guangyi, as "shareholders" in the cause of the Rebel Army, actually hold the military power, so when the other half of the founding monarch goes back on his word, they can still keep their original promises, because they are all temporary heroes and have ruthless thoughts on the founding monarch.