Without talent, mortals can't think; Without courage, his pen and ink cringed; Without knowledge, he cannot choose; Without strength, he can't be a family. (Qing) Ye Xie
Reading famous works can create eloquent talents. Voltaire (France)
My life is limited, but so is my knowledge. Zhuang Zhou (Warring States Period)
Correct the atmosphere and create a generalist. (Qing) Zhang Baixi
The trouble with people is to be a good teacher. Mencius (Warring States)
Angry and forgetful, happy and forgetful, I don't know that old age is coming. (Spring and Autumn) Kong Qiu
The wisdom of using books, not in books, but outside books, depends entirely on observation. bacon
If you study, you will be born; if you don't study, you will enter the coffin.
There are three ways to read, namely, heart, eyes and mouth. Chu Hsi
Knowledge is power. bacon
Academic talent, if you don't advance, you will fall back. (clear) left
Teenagers only know how to play, but don't know how to study hard. When they are old, they regret why they didn't know how to study hard when they were young. (Tang) Yan Zhenqing
Learning is like sailing against the current. If you don't advance, you will retreat. (clear) left
Learning without skill, learning without skill for a while, learning without skill, is the road to success. (Song) Zhu
Scholars should be ambitious, knowledgeable, persistent and ambitious. If they don't want to be vulgar and knowledgeable, they will know everything and dare not be self-sufficient. For example, Hebo watches the sea, like a well frog peeping into the sky, and he has no knowledge of constancy, so he can do anything, and all three are indispensable. (Qing) Zeng Guofan
What you get on paper is so shallow that you never know what you have to do. Learning without thinking is useless, thinking without learning is dangerous. (Spring and Autumn) Kong Qiu
Reading can change a person's skeletal image. Reading clears the mind. Voltaire
Books or medicine, good reading can cure fools. Liu Xiang
2. It is false to regard learning as a decoration and learn more famous sayings that change fate; It is the quirk of scholars to judge things completely according to the laws of learning. bacon
A wise man has long ears and short tongue. -flaig
Repetition is the mother of learning. -Dietzgen
Don't go to bed when you can't tell yourself what you learned today. Fort Lee Heaton
The person who inquires is only a fool for five minutes; He who is ashamed to ask questions is a fool all his life. anonymous
The three conditions of learning are: more observation, more hardship and more research. Garfield
People are learning things every day, and what they often learn is to find out that what they learned yesterday is wrong. ——B.V
I didn't get any other benefits from my efforts, but I became more and more aware of my ignorance.
Descartes
The secret of learning a lot is not to learn a lot at once. -Locke
Learning is an extremely precious thing, and it is not shameful to absorb it from any source. -Abu Ri Faraz
Learning is labor, which is full of thoughts. -ushinski
Idle learning is not better than idle learning. Joe Bells
The first sign of an educated mind is being good at asking questions. -plekhanov
3. There are many short examples of reading changing fate in ancient and modern China and foreign countries. For example, Chen Jingrun in China, originally from a poor family, worked as an apprentice in a grocery store. However, he did not give in to fate, but continued to strive for self-improvement. He taught himself mathematics in the evening and then listened to it in Tsinghua. Later, he changed his fate because of the famous Goldbach conjecture and even shocked the world. There is also Helen Keller in the United States, who was blind and deaf at the age of one and a half, but she persisted in fighting against her fate. Under the guidance of her tutor, she learned Braille, spelled words, expressed herself and learned to speak. At the age of 20, she was admitted to Harvard University Women's College. If she doesn't study hard, but gives up on herself, I believe she is just a poor disabled person, but she has created "knowledge to change her destiny" with her perseverance. Li Ka-shing, the richest man in China, famously said, "Knowledge changes fate". His wealth is11900 million dollars. Biography: 65,438+0928 was born in Chaozhou, Guangdong, and his father was a primary school principal.
1940, the whole family fled to Hong Kong to escape the oppression of the Japanese invaders. Two years later, my father died of illness.
Li Ka-shing was forced to drop out of school to make a living. 1950, Li Ka-shing, who was only 22 years old, founded Changjiang Plastic Factory in Shau Kei Wan.
From 65438 to 0958, Li Ka-shing began to invest in the real estate market. Changjiang Industry 1972 went public, and its shares were oversubscribed by 65 times.
1979, Changjiang acquired hutcheson Huimbo, an old British enterprise. 1984, "Changjiang" bought the controlling stake of "Hongkong Electric Company".
1In the mid-1960s, Hong Kong's real estate industry fell into a trough, and Li Ka-shing boldly invested in real estate. 1979 acquired Hutchison whampoa and entered the port transportation industry. By 1995+02, the total market value of the three listed companies of Cheung Kong Industrial Group has exceeded 42 billion US dollars. In 2003-2004, Li Ka-shing was unlucky, even in Li Ka-shing's face, he often looked as cold as ice.
More than three months ago, on March 1 1 day, 2004, Tom Online (HK 8282) fell below the issue price on the first day of listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The purchase price of TOM Online was HK$ 1.5, which closed at HK$ 1.4 on the first day, down 6.7%.
Is it really impossible to repeat the scene of buying Li Ka-shing-related stocks in long queues and empty lanes? On March 16, Li Ka-shing's other listed company, Zhonglian System (HK 0757), closed at HK$ 0.630, which was 30% lower than the issue price of HK$ 0.90, and hundreds of retail investors and institutional investors suffered a heavy blow. At the beginning of the year, Hutchison Whampoa injected Hong Kong's fixed-line business into Zhonglian System, which issued new shares worth HK$ 3.9 billion and convertible bonds worth HK$ 3.2 billion to pay for the acquisition, making Li Ka-shing's enterprise groups profit HK$ 654.38+03 billion.
This move caused great controversy. 65438+1On October 30th, David Weber, director of HKEx, a member of the shareholders' equity group and the merger and reorganization group of CSRC, severely criticized the transaction, saying that it exposed the loopholes in the current listing rules.
What the hell happened to Superman? All-powerful Li Ka-shing has always been an irreplaceable idol in the eyes of Chinese people all over the world. In the 1960s, Superman entered Hong Kong real estate and made huge profits for 30 years. 196, Hutchison Whampoa, which is controlled by Li Xicheng, invested in the UK, established the telecommunications company ORANGE and went public, with a total investment of HK$ 8.4 billion.
Subsequently, ORANGE became the third mobile phone operator in Britain under the operation of Superman. Later, Hutchison Whampoa decided to split up and go public, and gained a special income of HK$ 465.438 billion, and recovered more than half of the initial investment.
1999, at the cost of11300 million Hong Kong dollars, sold more than 40% of the shares of ORANGE to Deutsche Telekom Consortium, and exchanged shares with the consortium, successfully entered the Deutsche Telekom Consortium and became the largest shareholder with single shareholding. In this transaction, Li Xicheng's cost is almost zero, and the return is over HK$ 654.38 billion in cash and a lot of equity.
The last time was at the end of 2003, when China Life went public, Superman earned 654.38+02 billion in six days. But only a few months later, the controversy about Superman began to appear widely.
From a poor boy to the "king of plastic flowers", from a real estate tycoon to a white knight to save the city, from a "superman" to a leader of the new economy, from a management master to a leader of high-tech media, where will the world famous city Li Ka-shing go next? Comments: A poor teenager, with his diligence and wisdom, has completed the myth of wealth creation for generations or even dozens of generations in decades. When the world is in recession, I have repeatedly shot and earned a lot of money. The classic case of capital market has also been included in the business courses of world management masters.
Superman has become the richest man in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan with a wealth of US$ 654.38+0.2 billion. At the same time, he has achieved his sacred position in the eyes of China people by concentrating the personal experiences of countless people in creating dreams.
Reading can't change the fate of celebrities. The first is to steal the concept.
From the beginning, opponents thought that knowledge could change fate. Although the definition of "knowledge-the sum of knowledge and experience accumulated by human beings about nature and society" was later pointed out, the two concepts of "change" and "fate" were not well explained.
Why not make such an explanation? It's not that the other party doesn't understand the concepts of these two words, but that they dare not. If he gives the exact definition of "change", it means that all his arguments are invalid. In order to illustrate the view that "individual knowledge can change individual destiny and collective knowledge can change collective destiny", the other debater cited some specific events in the Three Kingdoms.
I would like to ask Zhu Gekongming, although he is well educated and proficient in military strategy, can he change the fate of the final demise of the Han Dynasty and the reunification of the Three Kingdoms? These examples can only show one thing: his knowledge can influence his fate and become a "father" instead of a "change". Everyone knows that "influence" and "change" are essentially two fundamentally different concepts.
But thanks to other debaters, these examples can be sufficient arguments to prove that "knowledge can't change fate". The second is logical confusion.
Another debater mentioned that "knowledge is playing an increasingly important role in changing human living environment, avoiding and reducing losses caused by natural disasters, and even making many things that seem impossible today possible." Relevant examples are also cited to illustrate the importance of knowledge.
For example, "science and technology are the primary productive forces" and "four W's", but are these directly related to fate? The confusion of logic is obvious. Because there is no direct connection, other debaters dare not mention the two concepts of "change" and "fate" in their arguments.
He knows that all the examples can only show that "knowledge can affect the development of some things", to say the least, "knowledge can affect fate", but it still can't show that "knowledge can change fate". Finally, it is inconsistent.
The other debater first mentioned that "with the rapid development of science and technology, the way of survival and production that only depends on will and courage and depends on the sky is no longer applicable today", trying to overthrow our debater's argument from the side and explain that only knowledge can change fate, but later mentioned that "of course, will and courage are also very important, which gives us the courage to change our destiny with knowledge." So, is will and courage important? But I don't think this needs to be answered by the other debater. The influence of will and courage on knowledge is beyond our discussion. The discussion can only digress, Wan Li. We are talking about knowledge and destiny, not knowledge, will and courage. It doesn't make any sense to struggle.
With regard to knowledge and fate, our view is that knowledge cannot change fate. The concepts of "knowledge", "change" and "fate" have been clearly stated by our debaters, so I won't repeat them here.
What I want to say is; There are indeed many specific factors that affect fate, such as knowledge, personality, values and behavior quality. A man with knowledge can only say that he has more opportunities to choose his destiny, that is, knowledge can only affect his destiny to a certain extent, but not change it.
There is an example: "When a person is sentenced to life imprisonment, let him finish his doctorate and have more knowledge. What is his fate?" Or die of old age in prison. "Of course, the other debater can say that this case is special and can cite many examples to refute it, but I just want to make it clear that knowledge can make him a doctor, but it can't change his fate of' life imprisonment'.
"Knowledge is power" is a universally recognized truth, which shows that the influence of knowledge is enormous, and there are many examples, which are also quoted by the other debater. This is undeniable. But no one can say for sure that "knowledge is fate", right? The other debater may question: You have said so much that "knowledge can't change fate", so what can change fate? As I said before, there are many factors that affect fate, and knowledge is just one of them.
Whether knowledge can change fate through the above discussion, I believe everyone has a conclusion. If we really want to discuss "what can change fate?" That's another topic of debate.
Looking at the other side's whole debate, we only discussed some of our examples and talked about others. We didn't further demonstrate our theme, but simply explained the importance and influence of knowledge, and came to the conclusion that knowledge can change fate. But from the whole argument, we can only draw the conclusion that knowledge can affect fate, not that knowledge can change fate. Another thing to mention is that the other party's view that "knowledge can't change fate" is a false proposition when making a conclusion. I'm confused. How to argue when the other party doesn't even know the basic knowledge of the debate? The theme of the debate is worth discussing, not which theme is "true" or "false".
Here, I also sincerely hope that the other party will debate after learning the basic knowledge of debate, otherwise it will be led by us. Finally, I still insist that knowledge can't change fate.
That's all. Thank you.
5. Reading changes fate case Luo Runfa, male, 36 years old, Shaoxing native, physically disabled, walks on two small benches. After graduating from junior high school, I looked around for a job and made a living by typing with an old typewriter. 1990 self-taught computer, overworked for a long time, resulting in eye fatigue and bleeding, and almost blindness. Computer training center was established in 1995. In recent years, it has grown from 8 square meters of two computers to 700 square meters of more than 250 computers, and trained more than 2,000 students every year. Up to now, nearly 20,000 trainees have been trained, which has won praise from all parties. He has been rated as an advanced individual in municipal education for many times, and won the honors of "Five Good Business Households" and "City Youth Civilization" at the municipal and district levels. After he became rich, he did not forget to repay the society and donated 40 thousand yuan to various public welfare undertakings before and after. He sent a donation of 6.5438+0 million yuan to the front line of flood control in Wuhan, and the three towns in Wuhan were deeply shocked.
Helen Keller is an American disabled educator. When she was 19 months old, she was blind and deaf because of a high fever. Later, with the efforts of her tutor Ann Sullivan, she learned to speak, began to communicate with people, learned cultural knowledge and graduated from Harvard University.
After her death, she touched the whole world because of her strong will and outstanding contribution. People all over the world have carried out activities to commemorate her.
When Guo 1982 entered Dalian Port from rural Shandong, he never dreamed that he would become the deputy director of Dalian Port North Equipment Repair Factory 20 years later. Guo, who has never seen a train, has become an expert in train maintenance in Dalian Port Train Depot through self-taught mechanical maintenance, and has become a national self-taught model.
Li Ka-shing, male, Han nationality. 1928 was born in Chaozhou, Guangdong, and his father was a primary school principal. 1940, the whole family fled to Hong Kong to escape the oppression of the Japanese invaders. 1942, father died of illness. In order to support his mother and three siblings, Li Ka-shing was forced to drop out of school.
First, Li Ka-shing sells in a toy manufacturing company. Although busy with work, Li Ka-shing, who dropped out of school, still went to night school to study and catch up with culture in his spare time. Because of his diligence and cleverness, he was promoted to be the acting general manager of Sina's investment promotion at the 39th World Advertising Conference before he was 20 years old. Two years later, Li Ka-shing seized the opportunity to set up his own plastic factory with the $7,000 he usually saved. He named it "Changjiang Plastic Factory".
From 65438 to 0958, Li Ka-shing began to invest in the real estate market. With its unique vision and shrewd development strategy, "Changjiang" has quickly become a major real estate development and investment industrial company in Hong Kong. When Changjiang Industry 1972 went public, its shares were oversubscribed by 65 times. By the end of 1970s, he had stood out among the tycoons of his generation.