To put it bluntly, most job seekers just don't have personal projects, so the company can only screen them according to their resumes. After all, working for three years is easier to be technically mature than working for one year, but it is different if you have a personal project.
Falsification is not the way out. If the company does the opposite, integrity will not pass. In the process of job hunting, in addition to the relationship between market supply and demand, it depends on whether you match the enterprise and meet the needs of the other party. If you still have personal project experience (which can directly prove your working ability), those working years really shouldn't be your threshold.
The matching degree and project experience need to be reflected in the resume expression, and HR needs to realize that after all, when HR screens resumes, it can only judge this person through resumes. How to maximize the value of resume and how to show the resume content that meets the needs of enterprises is the most important thing, not to solve it through fraud.
Take programmers as an example, 70% of the resumes in the programmer market are moisture. Whether you are a senior or a junior, it is not shameful for young people to beautify 50%. This is not your shame, but the fault of the whole industry. Look at Zhihu's last question about writing code for ten years. How many people use the experience of primary school and junior high school to fill the water? If you get in touch early, junior high school and senior high school can write several hours of code a week. Why is this a symbol of the wisdom tiger? When writing a resume, you will feel that your moral standards are high and you should be rigorous and realistic.
There is no shame in getting an interview. Because this is the real society. It's shameful that the interview was brushed off. Computer is an engineering course, and it is shameful to talk about heroes without results.
That's all, I hope it will help your problem!