I don't think you have seen the first China-US free boxing competition. At that time, China and the United States each sent ten players, nine men and one woman. China athletes are all soldiers except Liu Hailong, a folk Sanda athlete who is only 18 years old. Most American players are karate, judo, taekwondo, boxing and wrestling, and they are basically masters of opening a museum and accepting disciples. They are young, strong and flexible, while China players are relatively American. In that World War I, China was seven wins and three losses. Liu Hailong, a folk player, became famous in World War I for nearly twenty years. He was impressed. China players are fierce, with three fists and two feet, whipping and kicking straight, without any fancy movements. The winning game lasted less than a minute. Basically, the United States can't stand the heavy punches from China, give up the game and lose the game. The China player was inexperienced and didn't protect his head when attacking. I remember a China athlete who was similar to Zhou Bili in height, appearance and playing style had a conflict with the owner of a karate club in the United States. After winning, after the referee announced the result, there was a back flip, but the owner of the American karate club refused to accept it and also came to a back flip.

Before 2000, this game was broadcast live by CCTV. Among the nine male players, Liu Hailong is weak. Other masters, the military, have you ever heard of them coming out to make money? They are the sharp weapon of the country, the real soldiers, the special forces among the special forces, the killing brake and the king of modern Sanda. If we put them in Liu Hailong in this era, how many are better than Liu Hailong? How many people dare to challenge these masters?

Wushu or Sanda, what kind of training you receive, what kind of reaction you will have. The result of confrontation comes from the result of your training, talent and physical quality. There is no strongest Sect, only the strongest individual.

Say it again, civilian experts, military experts. In the past, there was a saying that a civil and military teacher who served the royal family and the people, received military training and served the country was a military master. On the contrary, a military master, who retired for some special reasons and taught martial arts among the people, is a master of the people. Sometimes, the difference between the army and the people is not that big.