This man's name is Wang Fuzhong. Surprisingly, he is also a full-time professor in Peking University. Who would have thought that the person who put forward the absurd idea of eliminating farmers was actually a professor at the highest institution in China? And what is the specific content of his statement? He thinks that farmers are seriously lacking in professional knowledge and technology, which has little impact on our daily life and has little to do with food. When this statement came out, it was jaw-dropping. Primary school students know that "weeding is noon, and sweat drips down the soil." They know that food is hard-won, and it is earned by the hard work of thousands of farmers' uncles in Qian Qian. The professor's words make people laugh. If you dare to ask the professor, you don't have to eat? Where did the food come from? Without farmers, he may still be trapped in the problem of food and clothing, which is really annoying.
Who in Wang Fuzhong dares to say such arrogant words? On the one hand, the title of his resume can be described as luxurious, covering not only senior titles such as Professor Peking University and a well-known doctor of economics in China, but also the head of the Department of International Trade of Beihang University. Theoretically, a scholar of this level should not say such things. The reason is that he feels knowledgeable and arrogant, despises such a basic occupation as a farmer, and feels that others don't understand him. He also expounded his views in a speech. He thinks that farmers don't understand the scientific knowledge about land fertilization, so this profession must be eliminated. But he forgot a truth. Practice is the only criterion for testing truth. He talks about it with Kan Kan's mouth, so that when he really goes to the land, he can't even sow or use farm tools. But farmers are born in the land, and their practical experience is much richer than this professor. They know how to work and get a better harvest.
What is even more infuriating is that Wang Fuzhong not only said that farmers don't need to exist, but also despised other occupations by the way. Later, he also paid the price for his irresponsible remarks. Because of public anger and criticism of public opinion, his position was in jeopardy, so he apologized to all walks of life. Of course, it is unclear whether he really felt it. However, no matter what his inner thoughts are, in people's minds, he is already in danger.
After this incident, we must understand that all occupations are equal and have their own meanings. On the surface, technological differences do not determine which occupation is higher or lower. Just like an old saying, every family has its own problems. Every profession and every working people need the respect of all of us. Similarly, respect is mutual. When a person does not respect others, he will not be respected. What do you think can be discussed in the comments section?