2017165438+1October 6 10, the second trial of the parrot case, which attracted much attention, was held in Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court. Previously, Wang Peng, a Shenzhen man, was sentenced to five years' imprisonment by the local court for the crime of illegally selling precious and endangered wild animals. After the judgment of the first instance, Wang Peng appealed.

In the morning, Wang Peng's parents, wife Pan Pan and children Bao Xiao all went to the Intermediate People's Court. Wang Peng's father and his wife, Pan Pan, entered the court to attend, while Wang Peng's mother stayed outside to take care of Bao Xiao, who could not enter the court. Wang Peng's attorneys Xu Xin and Si have arrived at the Intermediate People's Court in advance.

Xin Xu, a defense lawyer in the second trial of Wang Peng case and a law professor at Beijing Institute of Technology, believes that Wang Peng has no criminal intention to profit from it subjectively and has not caused social harm objectively, and the sentence in the first trial is too heavy. In addition, parrots are highly reproductive ornamental species, and should not be treated equally with wild weakly reproductive animals such as giant pandas in the experiment.