The first is to solve the position problem. Addressing leadership positions is the most common and safest one, such as "Director Wang", "Secretary Zhang" and "Director Li". However, this kind of address is a bit too formal, official and unfriendly, so some people improve it and directly address their positions, such as "director", "secretary" and "director". Others call it "name+position", such as "Director of the Founding of the People's Republic of China", "Secretary of Peace" and "Director Cheng Xiao", which are more intimate and close. However, not everyone can name the leader. Calling "name+position" is mostly between team members or people who are particularly familiar with the leader, at least with the approval of the leader. Therefore, if you are not familiar with the leadership, or don't know how to call it, it is better to call it a leadership position.
The second is to address comrades. In the revolutionary era, everyone called each other comrades, and now it is also advocated within the party, but there are fewer comrades in actual work. This kind of address feels too formal and serious, and the relationship is somewhat different. Calling comrades is more in democratic life and organizational life, which is the requirement of the meeting, and it is only used at the meeting, and then renamed as a post after the meeting.
The third is swearing. Some leaders said, "Don't call me by my position, just call me by my name." That's a sign of self-modesty. Just lip service. But in the workplace, it is rare to really call leaders by their first names. The "number one" of a general unit can call the deputy directly, the old leader can call the young leader by his first name, and sometimes the team members can call him by his first name. It would be disrespectful for subordinates to call their leaders by their first names. Not only the leader may be unhappy, but also colleagues will think that you don't know the rules, and it's no big deal or small matter.
The fourth is to call "leaders". Some comrades like to call leaders "leaders", such as "leading down to guide the work?" "What instructions does the leader have today?" Wait a minute. On the surface, this title shows great respect for the leader, but in fact it widens the distance with the leader. Some leaders don't like this kind of address, and they think it is a bit excessive, false and even glib.
The fifth is to call "the boss". In the past, enterprises liked to address the leaders, such as ",",because "zong" is bigger than no "zong" Now there is a flood of business owners, and small enterprises also have "directors" and "general managers". The title of boss is not as good as before. There are also "Zong" who are not very elegant, such as "Niu Zong" and "Ma Zong". An enterprise specially issued a notice to standardize the address of leaders, requiring subordinate units to address leaders as "general manager", and not as "general manager Zhu" casually.
The sixth is to call "the boss". For a time, it was popular to call leaders "bosses" in the workplace, not only in enterprises, but also in administrative organs. "Boss" is generally a special title for "number one", and some leaders also like to be called by others, just like the old shopkeeper, who was in charge of human rights and financial power at that time and could show leadership authority. It doesn't matter if you call it that in the enterprise, but also in the administrative department. It's like treating an institution as a market and a leader as a businessman. After all, it is somewhat inappropriate and loses the image of an organ.
The seventh kind is called "boss". Some people like to call their leaders "bosses". Although there are few names on the surface, many behind-the-scenes names and many names on the wine table, this kind of address is relatively Jianghu and not suitable for the workplace, especially the administrative department. Calling "boss" means that I recognize you as "big brother", which means that I am your person, or that we are in the same group and are suspected of engaging in group gangs, which is taboo in administrative organs.
Eight is called "brother". Some people are close to the leaders, so they are called "brothers" and "brothers". Some leaders will call their subordinates "brothers" and "brothers" in order to win over their subordinates. Of course, these are private names and cannot be put on the table. Others call everyone "brothers" in order to befriend, and don't take it too seriously. So many brothers in the workplace.
In short, different units, different occasions and different times have different names for leaders. If there are any rules, I think you can abide by them seriously. Leaders can call you whatever they like, and most of the time there is nothing wrong with it. Finally, by the way, where is leadership? Let's give them a taste.